JFK RFK MLK Assasination Forum - Archive

While many medical professionals at Parkland expressed the opinion the throat wound was a wound of entrance, it must be remembered there were a limited number of these people who saw the throat wound, Correct! But ALL who saw the wound, described it the same way....UNIFORMITY! All within approx. 15-...

Bob, I was just curious if you read the 2nd article that I posted above; the one regarding the common sense rules of evidence interpretation? To summarize, perhaps you might consider the possibility you may be giving too much weight to evidence that was documented over 6 hours after the event. This ...

Robert, Great piece and thoughtful analysis! Don't know how long you've been posting on this blog but I've stirred up quite a controversy in the past trying to get a debate going on this subject. We have very similar perspectives about all this, you might enjoy what I wrote quite a while back. Appar...

steve manning wrote:Bob Lilly wrote:Good work Steve. I think you are right about the throat wound. 1. The shooter could still have been on the knoll as JFK had his head turned to right and seems to have been hit just as he emerged to shooters view from behind Stemmons Freeway sign. The shooter did n...

Bob Lilly wrote:Good work Steve. I think you are right about the throat wound. 1. The shooter could still have been on the knoll as JFK had his head turned to right and seems to have been hit just as he emerged to shooters view from behind Stemmons Freeway sign. The shooter did not have to be in fro...

6. The throat wound could not have been caused by pieces of the head shot bullet or super heated mercury from that bullet as the throat wound was received before the head shot.Great observation! This has been the one piece of my theory that has definitely been missing.Steve

Obviously there is more than one type of evidence. For example there is: physical, circumstantial, hear-say, eye witness testimony, etc; all of which can be scientifically ranked in terms of importance and/or priority and reliability. Obviously, the idea is to interpret all of it by giving it the we...

Glad you liked it Slav! I think most everyone else on this site still recalls the paper I posted back in 2009...Wim was not too happy with it either. I'm glad you can see it the way Gil Jesus does...NO DISRESPECT TO THE OTHER THEORY but its simply much easier to believe.

Its been awhile since I've posted anything, but, as I've stated before, I find the research of Gil Jesus impeccable! In fact, the evidence in this video is irrefutable! I understand how much it would suck to already have another theory in print, but how can we deny the truth, regardless who discover...

you need to get your head examined, and very soon