JFK RFK MLK Assasination Forum - Archive

kenmurray wrote:Here is a good site on WTC7:http://www.wtc7.net/Also:The BBC''s WTC 7 Collapsed at 4:54 PM! http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/bbc_wtc7_videos.htmlOn that site is a link to this:http://winterpatriot.blogspot.com/2007/11/seffens-folly-attempted-911-hoax-by.htmlIn the end, a pap...

kenmurray wrote:Here is a good site on WTC7:http://www.wtc7.net/Also:The BBC''s WTC 7 Collapsed at 4:54 PM! Perfidious Albion strikes again!

Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:Mike Ellwood wrote:Sorry, not talking about fake planes, but in this posting:http://forum.jfkmurdersolved.com/viewtopic.php?p=6222#p6222dated Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:25 am Wim said fairly forcibly the thesis that the Twin Towers were taken down by controlled demolition had been...

kenmurray wrote:Keep up the good work Michael.Yes, excellent presentation and Q&A.Also the Dealey Plaza picture presentation.

katisha wrote:Bob wrote:Thank God for guys like Mark Lane and Jim Garrison who kept this fight alive in the early years after the events of 11/22/1963. Lane is still fighting the fight today. If there is ever a Mount Rushmore for JFK assassination researchers, both Lane and Garrison would be up ther...

kenmurray wrote:While Oswald may have gone to Mexico City once, I don't believe he was there when the WC said he was. http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htmThank you for the link Ken.

I see that someone has posted above a Google link to the 1993 video, but here is a YouTube link to what is I think the same thing, for anyone who hasn't seen it (as I hadn't, until recently finding this, although I have seen excerpts before):http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQxa-1uNQm8&feature=rel...

Sorry, I couldn't find a better thread to ask this question:Who is the priest waving his hands around histrionically at the end of part 2 of "Evidence of Revision"? I suppose he is a cardinal or an archbishop or something. I got the impression that on the whole, he was not all that keen on...

Fascinating listening, on a socio-cultural level, as well as for the substance of the debate.Those other guys sounded like characters from an old-time black and white movie, while Mark Lane represented the voice of the new age.This was still the early days of the sixties. Men still wore white shirts...

Thanks for explaining "Royalist" Jim.