JFK RFK MLK Assasination Forum - Archive

ChristophMessner wrote:Good work, Martin! So they claimed, the photo was shot in March 63, whereas the shadows show, that it could have only been shot in Mai or August. That's what I understand. Right? Correct Chris.Early may and also early august was the only possibility to do it at that location.C...

Thank you Sir.Martin

Thank you Pasquale!Good questions.Lot of issues in this photographs.Take a look at here: http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/in ... 490.0.html Some animated GIF's i've done.You are a guest and not able to see the attachements?C'mon join. You won't regret.You are very welcome.Martin

Frenchy wrote:Martin i dont think Oswald fired a rifle that day, but im curious does every rifle ommit nitrates?I dont know myself thats why i ask.Simple answer: YesMassively. Thats one reason why they made the test. Martin

Bob wrote:Nice work Martin! I would say someone in the intelligence field that has expertise in photograph doctoring. Didn't Oswald have some background in the photography field as well?Thank you Bob. Much appreciated. Yes he had. Thats the reason why this intelligent man said these are fabrications...

As you may all know Lee Harvey Oswald claimed to be not the man on the backyard photographs.Oswald himself, when shown the photo in jail, claimed he had never seen it before and insisted someone had superimposed his head onto another body.So far so good. David Von Pein gave me enough motivation to p...

Another important evidence of Oswalds innocence firing i rifle, is the missing paraffin on his cheek.A paraffin test on his cheek fails. During his questioning Lee Harvey Oswald was administered a paraffin test by W. E. Barnes of the Dallas Police Department. In this test warm paraffin, which is app...

Hi all. The tramp photo's were made 1,5 hours after the assassination regarding to this website.Oswald was already in arrest at that time.http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/lois1.htmMartin

dankbaar wrote:Martin, not sure what you mean with this: My main intention was to bring you back to your forum and the people here, Wim. ThanksMartin

Bob wrote:I heard from Wim about a couple weeks back.Bob wrote:I heard from Wim about a couple weeks back.Bob, the silence of Wim might came from this source:http://www.manuscriptservice.com/Headstamp/#STATEMENTFrom Allan Eaglesham.Silence is always not a good sign.Read in particular the first line ...