Wim=1000 Opposition=0

JFK Assassination
Paul
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Post by Paul »

Jim Harwood wrote:With the JFK case you dont have the ability to prove even what type of weapon was used in this shooting.Jim H.

Yes you have: exhume the body and head/skull of JFK.
Mercury lasts for ever and if there are traces of mercury on JFK there's your proof...

Gr. Paul.
Jim Harwood
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Post by Jim Harwood »

Paul wrote:Jim Harwood wrote:With the JFK case you dont have the ability to prove even what type of weapon was used in this shooting.Jim H.Yes you have: exhume the body and head/skull of JFK.Mercury lasts for ever and if there are traces of mercury on JFK there's your proof...Gr. Paul.

So finding traces of Mercury would prove the type of weapon used? Or if there was more than one rifle used?
Bruce Patrick Brychek
Posts: 1306
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

PAUL AND JIM HARWOOD:

Post by Bruce Patrick Brychek »

Dear Messers. Paul, and Jim Harwood,

I have just reviewed your Responses.

Are you, and others, aware that a Federal Court Action, filed by the late Joe West, who was friends with my friend Jimmy Files, was filed to exhume the "body of JFK." This case was taking shape. Joe also focused on the mercury traces theory. "Insiders" warned that the case must be stopped. Some sources believe that JFK was burried at sea, as was the late JFK, Jr., to avoid their bodies ever being dug up.

"Inside" sources felt Joe West was killed to end the lawsuit. Joe West "died." The lawsuit to exhume JFK'S body "ended." Nobody has ever refiled.

Respectfully,
Bruce Patrick Brychek.
Johan van Leeuwen
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Mellon

Post by Johan van Leeuwen »

Jim Harwood wrote:What would the shooting of a mellon accomplish? You could shoot a mellon with a bow and arrow. Would that prove William Tell killed President Kennedy?

Johan van Leeuwen
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Post by Johan van Leeuwen »

Jim Harwood wrote:Paul wrote:Jim Harwood wrote:With the JFK case you dont have the ability to prove even what type of weapon was used in this shooting.Jim H.Yes you have: exhume the body and head/skull of JFK.Mercury lasts for ever and if there are traces of mercury on JFK there's your proof...Gr. Paul.So finding traces of Mercury would prove the type of weapon used? Or if there was more than one rifle used?

James Files claims he used a bullet with a special load: mercury. In the LHO explenation, a mercury load is never mentioned.
So if the head of JFK contains mercury, what would that say.... let's think..... does that say anything?... ehhhhh.... I got it! That he ate mercury for breakfast!
Paul
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Post by Paul »

Johan van Leeuwen wrote:James Files claims he used a bullet with a special load: mercury. In the LHO explenation, a mercury load is never mentioned. So if the head of JFK contains mercury, what would that say.... let's think..... does that say anything?... ehhhhh.... I got it! That he ate mercury for breakfast!



Gr. Paul.
Jim Harwood
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Post by Jim Harwood »

Johan van Leeuwen wrote:Jim Harwood wrote:Paul wrote:Jim Harwood wrote:With the JFK case you dont have the ability to prove even what type of weapon was used in this shooting.Jim H.Yes you have: exhume the body and head/skull of JFK.Mercury lasts for ever and if there are traces of mercury on JFK there's your proof...Gr. Paul.So finding traces of Mercury would prove the type of weapon used? Or if there was more than one rifle used?James Files claims he used a bullet with a special load: mercury. In the LHO explenation, a mercury load is never mentioned. So if the head of JFK contains mercury, what would that say.... let's think..... does that say anything?... ehhhhh.... I got it! That he ate mercury for breakfast!

Are you suggesting that the presence of mercury would confirm James Files as the assassin? I think you'd find any half witted attorney could successfully argue "reasonable doubt".
Eelco Blaauw
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Mellon

Post by Eelco Blaauw »

Jim Harwood wrote:What would the shooting of a mellon accomplish? You could shoot a mellon with a bow and arrow. Would that prove William Tell killed President Kennedy?Jim, you're not trying to think creative as some of the people on these boards do. Although lot of speculation isn't the answer to all our unsolved problems, focusing on the negative sides of these discoveries doesn't help these members to increase their knowledge in the Kennedy-assassination. It doesn't matter if they shoot a mellon. They might as well shoot a football, or a coconut, or a target on the wall. The point is: would Files be able to see the things he claims he saw, through the scope AFTER he shot the president with the Fireball? In order to test this, you must shoot at something with a Fireball and see for yourself. Like: can you see the mellon through the scope AFTER you shot it, despite the heavy recoil? That mellon might as well be something else, like JFK's head. Got it?Jim Harwood wrote:Johan van Leeuwen wrote:Jim Harwood wrote:Paul wrote:Jim Harwood wrote:With the JFK case you dont have the ability to prove even what type of weapon was used in this shooting.Jim H.Yes you have: exhume the body and head/skull of JFK.Mercury lasts for ever and if there are traces of mercury on JFK there's your proof...Gr. Paul.So finding traces of Mercury would prove the type of weapon used? Or if there was more than one rifle used?James Files claims he used a bullet with a special load: mercury. In the LHO explenation, a mercury load is never mentioned. So if the head of JFK contains mercury, what would that say.... let's think..... does that say anything?... ehhhhh.... I got it! That he ate mercury for breakfast!Are you suggesting that the presence of mercury would confirm James Files as the assassin? I think you'd find any half witted attorney could successfully argue "reasonable doubt".

Why are you speaking of attorneys? Who gives a **** about what happens to James Files. Who cares if he gets conficted, this is not about justice. THAT'S NOT THE POINT.
The point is: if there is mercury in JFK's head, then Files' story is correct. If Files' story is correct, then Lee Harvey Oswald didn't shoot the president. If Lee Harvey Oswald didn't shoot the president, then the Warren Commission conducted the most incompetent investigation in the history of the United States.

However we or anybody else acts with that info on a legal base is irrelevant, since most of the people involved are already six feet under. What is relevant, is what WE think of that. It's not about Oswald, Files or the Warren Commission. It's about what WE learn about JFK's assassination, and how we make our own thoughts about what America stands for and how America is supposed to 'lead' the world today. The remnants of JFK's assassination are still alive today. That's what's important, and not what happens to James Files!
Jim Harwood
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Mellon

Post by Jim Harwood »

Eelco Blaauw wrote:Jim Harwood wrote:What would the shooting of a mellon accomplish? You could shoot a mellon with a bow and arrow. Would that prove William Tell killed President Kennedy?Jim, you're not trying to think creative as some of the people on these boards do. Although lot of speculation isn't the answer to all our unsolved problems, focusing on the negative sides of these discoveries doesn't help these members to increase their knowledge in the Kennedy-assassination. It doesn't matter if they shoot a mellon. They might as well shoot a football, or a coconut, or a target on the wall. The point is: would Files be able to see the things he claims he saw, through the scope AFTER he shot the president with the Fireball? In order to test this, you must shoot at something with a Fireball and see for yourself. Like: can you see the mellon through the scope AFTER you shot it, despite the heavy recoil? That mellon might as well be something else, like JFK's head. Got it?Jim Harwood wrote:Johan van Leeuwen wrote:Jim Harwood wrote:Paul wrote:Jim Harwood wrote:With the JFK case you dont have the ability to prove even what type of weapon was used in this shooting.Jim H.Yes you have: exhume the body and head/skull of JFK.Mercury lasts for ever and if there are traces of mercury on JFK there's your proof...Gr. Paul.So finding traces of Mercury would prove the type of weapon used? Or if there was more than one rifle used?James Files claims he used a bullet with a special load: mercury. In the LHO explenation, a mercury load is never mentioned. So if the head of JFK contains mercury, what would that say.... let's think..... does that say anything?... ehhhhh.... I got it! That he ate mercury for breakfast!Are you suggesting that the presence of mercury would confirm James Files as the assassin? I think you'd find any half witted attorney could successfully argue "reasonable doubt".Why are you speaking of attorneys? Who gives a **** about what happens to James Files. Who cares if he gets conficted, this is not about justice. THAT'S NOT THE POINT. The point is: if there is mercury in JFK's head, then Files' story is correct. If Files' story is correct, then Lee Harvey Oswald didn't shoot the president. If Lee Harvey Oswald didn't shoot the president, then the Warren Commission conducted the most incompetent investigation in the history of the United States. However we or anybody else acts with that info on a legal base is irrelevant, since most of the people involved are already six feet under. What is relevant, is what WE think of that. It's not about Oswald, Files or the Warren Commission. It's about what WE learn about JFK's assassination, and how we make our own thoughts about what America stands for and how America is supposed to 'lead' the world today. The remnants of JFK's assassination are still alive today. That's what's important, and not what happens to James Files!

The presence of mercury in JFK's DNA would not prove that James Files was the shooter. Therefore what are you left with? You are left with the same outcome as before. Conjecture, speculation and wild theories. And I was not concerned with the welfare of James Files I was pointing out that the whole premise is flawed and easily dismissed in a court of law.

That the Warren Commision is a fraud has been known for over forty years now. The conspiracy tales which have grown out the this mess have also proven to be fraudulent. In the case of JFK's murder you have ample proof that the Government "NEVER" investigated the crime. This has led to the proliferation of false conspiracy tales mostly written , promoted and financed by the same group who planned and carried out the assassination. The MEDIA never gets in the way of promoting these wild conspiracy theories in fact they do all they can to create them.

And I am satisfied that I know who and why JFK was murdered. I do not subscribe to the CIA, US Government, Mafia, Texas Oil interest "did it" school of thought. The murder was planned by international interests centered around the British Monarchy and carried out by SOE Louis Mortimer Bloomfield out of Montreal Canada. The organization used to finance the assassination was Permindex. Canada has played a major role in several high profile assassinations in this country including Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King and John F. Kennedy.

You should try and learn more about universal history then you'll have a better understanding of how these kinds of political assasinations come about and just who is behind them.
Jim Harwood
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Louis Mortimer Bloomfield

Post by Jim Harwood »

Leading Montreal lawyer facing fraud charges Harry Bloomfield: Accused of aiding in US$17M 'pump and dump' scheme,
National Post (Canada), October 9, 2002
"A prominent Montreal lawyer and philanthropist, who served on the board of the Business Development Bank of Canada, is on trial in New York on 22 counts of criminal conspiracy. Authorities in the United States allege Harry Bloomfield, 58, helped organize a complex international stock fraud that used dummy offshore companies to bilk unsuspecting investors out of US$17 million ... . A senior partner in the law firm Bloomfield Bellemare, Mr. Bloomfield acts as a director to a number of banks and other companies, including Heller Financial Canada Ltd. and the Vermont Telephone Co. A member of the Progressive Conservative party who ran, unsuccessfully, in the 1980 federal election in the Montreal riding of Mount Royal, he was appointed to the Business Development Bank of Canada in 1987 by then prime minister Brian Mulroney. Mr. Bloomfield was chairman of the BDBC's audit committee from 1987 to 1991 ... . A fixture on Montreal's social circuit, he is renowned for making large public donations on behalf of his family and the charitable foundation that it manages. A number of Canadian public institutions and buildings are named after his family, including a wing of the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal and a student centre at St. Francis Xavier University in Nova Scotia. He holds many titles, including Knight of Justice of the Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem and Queen's Counsel. He is also the former national vice-president of B'Nai Brith Canada, and Canada's current consul general to Liberia, a position formerly held by his late uncle, Louis Mortimer Bloomfield."
Locked