Bullet Casing with Tooth Marks Manufactured 1971 or Later?
Re: Bullet Casing with Tooth Marks Manufactured 1971 or Late
JD you are great and Bruce is trying to open our minds and he doesn’t have any bad intensions please read the links I provided which I believe is the reason JFK was killed, once MJ 12 gave the order, the Millitary Followed threw, also in one of the links is Howard Hunt saying why JFK was killed, there a lot to read, I was going to paste it but it’s too long. We are all on the same team with good intensions toward each other .
-
Bruce Patrick Brychek
- Posts: 1306
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
JFK IS STILL DEAD AND NOTHING HAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED:
Thursday05.30.201912:48 p.m., Chicago, Illinois time:Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:JDB4JFK has been an excellent member and contributor to the JFKMS Forum for over 10 years, withapproximately 580 Academic Contributions.I often/usually agree with 80%+ of the Academic Contributions of JDB4JFK, and most of the Academic Material Posted on the JFKMS Forum.HOWEVER, IT IS MY COMPLETE, SINCERE, TOTAL INTENTION TO POKE THE BULL, AND STIR THE POT HERE, TO HOPEFULLY RE-GENERATE INCREASED, SUBSTANTIAL COMMUNICATION, DISCUSSION, INTEREST, RESEARCH, STUDYING, AND WRITING ABOUT THE REMOVAL OF JFK.MOVING ON:I completely, totally, unequivocally disagree with the previous statements of JDB4JFK. But there is nopersonal attack meant here, this is meant to generate Academic Efforts going forward here by all.JDB4JFK’s statements are just that, merely statements, and they are not established Statements of Factwhatsoever, and nothing more anywhere, anyplace, anytime.Some of the statements are mere conclusions.Some of the statements are mere conjecture.Some of the statements are mere Cut and Paste efforts.Some of the statements are mere innuendo.Some of the statements are mere rumor. Some of the statements are mere idle speculation.Throwing a lot of meat, noodles, and vegetables into a pot and cooking them may make for a great vegetablesoup or stew, but stewing all of these statements for 56 years does not establish anything more than whenthey were first cooked up and speculated to by the public.The statements are totally unsubstantiated by any evidence, anywhere, anyplace, anytime, in the last 56years, without any Formal investigations and Conclusions of Fact and Finding and Law whatsoever via any Court of Law, any any Investigative Agency, Investigation, and any Documented Confession, ever.MOVING ON:James Earl Sutton-Files alleged involvement in The Removal of JFK was “leaked” by the FBI beginning in1964. Files went on to sit for two (2) Interviews, the First in 1992, and the Second in 2003. These two (2)Interviews finally occurred after years of encouragement, harassment, and intimidation.Since his two (2) Interviews Files has been called a disinformation agent, a liar, a plant, a publicity seeker, etc., etc.Files’ two (2) Interviews have NEVER, EVER BEEN SERIOUSLY PURSUED BY A COURT OF LAW,INVESTIGATIVE AGENCY, OR GOVERNMENT AGENCY, LET ALONE THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA.MOVING ON:There were only 2 lawsuits ever filed in 56 years after The Removal of JFK in Dallas, Texas at 12:30 p.m.,on 11.22.1963, relative to The Removal of JFK.The First Law Suit filed by New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison ended in a Not Guilty Verdict, andJudgment for the Defendant, a New Orleans Business Man, Clay Shaw, a/k/a as Clay Bertrand.Granted, Shaw may have been a practicing homosexual/bisexual with David Ferry, Lee Harvey Oswald,and others as alleged, but never proven. And as distasteful as this may have been to many back then,these mere allegations have nothing to do with The Removal of JFK.Granted, there may have been later Substantiation, as Alleged, that Shaw had CIA Business ties. But this wasnever established and proven at Trial. And further, even if had been established at Trial, this would have hadno proof relative to The Removal of JFK. Many businesses around the time of The Vietnam War had some knowing or unknowing attachment to the CIA, and/or The Military Industrial Corporations. General Electric and General Motors had connectivity to the Vietnam War. Does that mean that anybody who used General Electric Electricity, or drove a General Motors Automobile was knowingly and intentionally supporting the Vietnam War for the CIA, and the Military Industrial Corporations ?The Second Law Suit relative to The JFK Removal was filed by Investigator Joe West to Exhume the Body ofJFK. West died under questionable circumstances, yes! But no other American has ever legally proceededto have JFK’s Body Exhumed for Examination, ESPECIALLY MEMBERS OF THE KENNEDY FAMILY.The Entire Kennedy Family has never actively, legally, openly, patently, publicly sought to Totally ReviewThe Removal of JFK, and all of the conjecture, innuendo, rumor, and speculation. ZERO EFFORT EVERBY THE ENTIRE KENNEDY FAMILY WITH ALL OF THIER CONTACTS, MONEY, AND RESOURCES.WHY ?MOVING ON:JFK and his policies were disliked by many. But almost half of the Voting Americans voted against JFK, andfor RICHARD MILIEUS NIXON, just as what recently occurred with TUMP vs. CLINTON.In 1963 there were No Cell Phones, No Personal Computers, Emails, Faxes, etc., as we know them today in 2019.No Face Book, No Faxes, No Link Em Up, No Social Media, No Twitter, etc., etc.Merely because Agencies, Agents, some Americans, Civil Organizations, Financial Organizations, Individuals,Military Organizations, etc., disliked JFK and his Policies, and benefitted by JFK’s Removal DOES NOTestablish anything conclusively.Many benefitted from JFK’s Election. Many suffered because of Nixon’s loss.Many would have benefitted from Nixon’s Election. Many would have suffered because of JFK’s loss.IN AMERICA POLITICS IS BUSINESS - BIG BUSINESS. NOTHING MORE. NOTHING LESS. ITALWAYS HAS BEEN. IT ALWAYS WILL BE.If all of the allegations supporting The Removal of JFK are now established Facts, and Provable in aCourt of Law why hasn’t Anyone, Anywhere, Anytime in America, in the Kennedy Family, the Government,the Main Stream Media, etc., GONE FORWARD WITH SOMETHING ?WHERE DID IT BEGIN ?WHO ORDERED THE REMOVAL OF JFK ?WHERE IS THE ORDER, RECORDED OR WRITTEN TO REMOVE JFK ? (CLUE - IT ACTUALLY EXISTS !)WHERE IS THERE ANY PROOF ? (CLUE - IT ACTUALLY EXISTS !)WHY HAS THE INTEREST IN THE REMOVAL OF JFK GONE “DEAD” (PARDON THE PUN), SINCE THE1992 MOVIE “JFK” BY FILM MAKER OLIVER STONE ?As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers who may not be as well versed as you.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.
-
Tommy Wilkens
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Re: Bullet Casing with Tooth Marks Manufactured 1971 or Late
Very interesting Post Bruce... Personally I think the case went dead after the shock waves subsided after several months or even a year after the JFK Movie was released and digested by the American public because in no time the Wheels that be went into full drive and threw the curtain of credibility out for all to hear and read and watch. Oliver Stone is one of the greatest film producers that ever lived. But he just might have embellished on a few of the real true facts that when once were studied and scrutinized and were pointed out and made public that fizzled the whole project the whole movie. The movie was outstanding I felt and walked the average Joe step by step right down the line on what and how and who was involved. One of the biggest errors that Stone made was in the film had a regular movie cut and then a Directors cut. Don't know how many here have watched the Directors cut but in that version the role of George de Mohrenschildt is brought out much more and with that the viewer gets a better understanding of what type people was swirling around Lee Oswald in the months leading up to the assassination. Just my two cents worth !!
Re: Bullet Casing with Tooth Marks Manufactured 1971 or Late
Ok Bruce I will play your game, but before I do please tell me what your version of a established statements of fact are? For instances: If I know for a fact that a CIA Operative had a rifle he loaned to another CIA guy, who hocked it to a detective agency in California because he owed them money, and told them he would be back in a week with the money to get his rifle back. He comes back a week before the assassination of JFK, and writes a check from a CIA known front company, than tells the two private eyes I'm on my way to Dallas, and than the FBI finds the rifle in Dallas at the crime seen, than the FBI calls the detective agency in California to set up a meeting. Than the FBI shows up at the detective agency the next day and asks them why is your fingerprints, and this CIA guys fingerprints all over this gun we found in Dallas. Would not a common sense jury consider that evidence as a fact that the CIA GUY was on site in Dealey Plaza? I mean were all dealing with circumstantial evidence and with that circumstantial we put two and two together with other corroborating evidence that leads us to a reasonable conclusion. There is no hard factual evidence in this case because we don't have an eyewitness who saw and could give a accurate description of the shooters, we have many weapons found but not reported, a botched autopsy, FBI was changing and altering evidence, CIA lies every time their lips move, so we have to speculate a common sense conclusion based on heavy circumstantial evidence that is corroborated by several facts. We would never solve a crime if we only did it based on hard facts only!BY the way I've been researching the JFK Assassination for 40 years since I read Rush To Judgement in the 7th grade! So I don't go off rumors, innuendos, mere conjecture, etc. I do it with lots of corroborating evidence and details of the evidence!
-
Bruce Patrick Brychek
- Posts: 1306
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
JFK IS STILL DEAD AND NOTHING HAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED:
Tuesday06.04.20196:11 p.m., Chicago, Illinois time:Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:Best Regards to JDB4JFK, and all who are Members and Readers here.My attempt to Poke the Bull, and Stir the Pot, are sincere for generating Advanced and Renewed Academic Interest in The Removal Of JFK 56 Years Later, going forward, and not merely regurgitating the same old nonsense, that is mostly circuitous, and has accomplished nothing 56 years later. So many chasing their Tails and Tales.MY OPINION: JFK IS STILL DEAD, AND NOTHING HAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED 56 YEARS LATER !JFK, LIKE MOBY DICK, HAS SUBMERGED INTO THE DEPTHS OF THE OCEANS OF HISTORY JUST LIKEABRAHAM LINCOLN.As an aside, two (2) white male college students upon being asked about Abraham Lincoln, andJohn F. Kennedy responded thusly:Abraham Lincoln, well he designed The Lincoln Automobile, didn't he ?John F. Kennedy, well he dated one of The Kardashians, or was he on DANCING WITH THE STARS ?MY OPINION: Today 90% of The JFK Research Community, and their divisiveness, likens them to Tin Foil Hat Wearing Conspiracy Lunatics, a reputation well deserved by many.MOVING ON: JDB4JFK I am certainly not playing a game. I am seeking to develop and encourageAdvanced and Renewed Academic Analysis, Reading, Researching, Studying, and Writing, hopefully connecting the Dots and Grains of Sand that have accumulated on The Beach of History Relative To The Removal Of JFK, And All Related Subject Matters.JDB4JFK here is My Simple, Superficial Analysis of your Response.At Best, anything you wrote might amount to Circumstantial or Hearsay Evidence after 56 years, but certainly is of Zero Dispositive or Erudite Value to anybody, anyplace, anywhere Relative To The Removal Of JFK Today, 56 years later.Everything you wrote is Inconsequential 56 years later.Everything you wrote is Immaterial 56 years later.Everything you wrote is Irrelevant 56 years later.What you have Written has Nothing of Dispositive or Substantial Value, especially 56 years later, and probably does not even amount to Circumstantial or Hearsay Evidence of anything today, in 2019, letalone any Conclusiveness Whatsoever !What you wrote Proves Nothing of Dispositive or Substantial Conclusions and/or Decisiveness, especially56 years later. "RUSH TO JUDGMENT" accomplished very little 56 years ago, and is virtually of less value today, 56 years after The Removal Of JFK. A nice read at best !Why has The Entire JFK Family remained effortless, and silent, especially after 56 years ? This ismonumental to many, and is said to speak for itself.Why is there No Advanced Academic Interest, Governmental Interest, Kennedy Family Interest, Hollywood Interest, Main Stream Media Interest, Public Interest, or Television Interest after Oliver Stone's 1992 movie "JFK" ?After Oliver Stone's movie "JFK" Real Interest In The Removal Of JFK Fell Of The Cliffs Of Time, and became Dead In The Waters Of Searching For The Total Truth !As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers who may not be as well versed as you.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.