http://onlinejustice.org/interface/index.php?action=236
The man behind this website is a person called J. Bartell of a company called www.Cybersoup.com
If you want to assist him with his "investigation" please help him at:
j@cybersoup.com
or + 1 818 718 0489
Wim
PS: Meanwhile I have included a poll question to rate Mr. Bartell's credibility.
Website with allegations on Wim Dankbaar
-
Arthur Overweel
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
I don't think anyone would want the kind of attention he is seeking, for it hurts his credibility and reputation, if he has any of that left.
The point is, nobody wants that kind of attention, unless you have a mental problem. That's why he keeps denying he authors the website, despite the proof that the website IP's address is from his server . Additionally, the man is so full of hatred for being sued for fraud and embzezzlement, that in his rage he is dumb enough to admit in emails he is in touch with the "people that run the website".
Me, I would worry if he had made the allegations a little more credible. Like it is now, he is only hurting himself.
Wim
The point is, nobody wants that kind of attention, unless you have a mental problem. That's why he keeps denying he authors the website, despite the proof that the website IP's address is from his server . Additionally, the man is so full of hatred for being sued for fraud and embzezzlement, that in his rage he is dumb enough to admit in emails he is in touch with the "people that run the website".
Me, I would worry if he had made the allegations a little more credible. Like it is now, he is only hurting himself.
Wim
That is REALLY disgusting. Wim, like Jim Garrison before him, has angered the people that want to keep the JFK assassanation under wraps. They will utilize any means possible to use character assassination based on horrible lies. This is a Karl Rovian tactic. They can't kill everyone literally, so they use words and lies as weapons to attack their enemies instead. One day these bastards will pay. Wim, I hope you get EVERY penny that bastard has in your lawsuit.
-
Bruce Patrick Brychek
- Posts: 1306
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Response To "Disgusting Website:"
Dear Mr. Wim Dankbaar, and Fellow JFK Forum Members,
I have tried a few times to check this website.
At my place of work, we have very sophisticated computer things. Understand that I am a White Belt when it comes to computers.
Anyway, because we interact with numerous city, county, state, and federal agencies, we "are on top of stuff," as I am told.
POINT BEING: I was warned to stay away from this site.
That is all that I will say on this subject. Those who know me are aware of some of my sources. Please trust me on this one, O.K. ?
Respectfully,
Bruce Patrick Brychek.
I have tried a few times to check this website.
At my place of work, we have very sophisticated computer things. Understand that I am a White Belt when it comes to computers.
Anyway, because we interact with numerous city, county, state, and federal agencies, we "are on top of stuff," as I am told.
POINT BEING: I was warned to stay away from this site.
That is all that I will say on this subject. Those who know me are aware of some of my sources. Please trust me on this one, O.K. ?
Respectfully,
Bruce Patrick Brychek.
-
Gibson DelGiudice
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Is it just me, or is this surprising somehow? The significance, to me, is that J. Bartell has been connected to the Files case before. He was interviewed for "JFK: The Proof" (meaning he could have been a Vernon witness* - can you tell us, Wim?) and eventually withdrew permission for Vernon to use his interviews in the documentary, with Wim's help.
*And thusly he could be acting under coercion
*And thusly he could be acting under coercion
-
Jim Thompson
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
?
dankbaar wrote:That's why he keeps denying he authors the website, despite the proof that the website IP's address is from his server .
Must be confused here.
CyberSoup
21704 Devonshire #134
Chatsworth, CA 91311
818-718-0489
This business allows an anonymous party who has an email address to set up free a website. Right? So, is (J. Bartell?) the owner of this business (& of this server) & the author of the disgusting website; or, is the author of the disgusting website some anonymous unknown party (Rick?) who is using CyberSoup's (Bartell's?) server? In either case the website would have this business' server's IP. Yes? If Bartell is using his server to send emails to Wim, then the server's IP will be seen in those emails.
If Bartell is the owner of CyberSoup, but NOT the author of the disgusting website, then Bartell must be horrified & embarrassed that his business would sponsor such garbage. In self business interest he would ax the website to preserve CyberSoup's business reputation. Yes?
What do his emails say?
- Jim
Must be confused here.
CyberSoup
21704 Devonshire #134
Chatsworth, CA 91311
818-718-0489
This business allows an anonymous party who has an email address to set up free a website. Right? So, is (J. Bartell?) the owner of this business (& of this server) & the author of the disgusting website; or, is the author of the disgusting website some anonymous unknown party (Rick?) who is using CyberSoup's (Bartell's?) server? In either case the website would have this business' server's IP. Yes? If Bartell is using his server to send emails to Wim, then the server's IP will be seen in those emails.
If Bartell is the owner of CyberSoup, but NOT the author of the disgusting website, then Bartell must be horrified & embarrassed that his business would sponsor such garbage. In self business interest he would ax the website to preserve CyberSoup's business reputation. Yes?
What do his emails say?
- Jim
There is really very little difference in whether he is hosting it for a third party or doing the website himself.
He has admiddted he is in in contact with the people doing the website and hosting it. I firmly believe that's another lie and that's he is making up everything himself . For example, the Mr. X described on this page is Bartell.
http://onlinejustice.org/interface/index.php?action=233
So he doesn't even have the guts to reveal himself.
Last email I received was the one below. I don't think that leaves room for discussion whether he is the guy promoting that website. Does it really make a difference whether he's hiding behind some fictional 3rd party?
----- Original Message -----
From: J Bartell
To: Wim Dankbaar
Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: Test
In Nov. you will not only jailed for child porn, but you will meet someone that will cause you to lose the money for the JFK project.
Happy days are here again.
Blocked
***************
You, as someone with coherent reasoning, are absolutely right with the quote below. The challenge is: Can you make him understand that?
If Bartell is the owner of CyberSoup, but NOT the author of the disgusting website, then Bartell must be horrified & embarrassed that his business would sponsor such garbage. In self business interest he would ax the website to preserve CyberSoup's business reputation. Yes?
He has admiddted he is in in contact with the people doing the website and hosting it. I firmly believe that's another lie and that's he is making up everything himself . For example, the Mr. X described on this page is Bartell.
http://onlinejustice.org/interface/index.php?action=233
So he doesn't even have the guts to reveal himself.
Last email I received was the one below. I don't think that leaves room for discussion whether he is the guy promoting that website. Does it really make a difference whether he's hiding behind some fictional 3rd party?
----- Original Message -----
From: J Bartell
To: Wim Dankbaar
Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: Test
In Nov. you will not only jailed for child porn, but you will meet someone that will cause you to lose the money for the JFK project.
Happy days are here again.
Blocked
***************
You, as someone with coherent reasoning, are absolutely right with the quote below. The challenge is: Can you make him understand that?
If Bartell is the owner of CyberSoup, but NOT the author of the disgusting website, then Bartell must be horrified & embarrassed that his business would sponsor such garbage. In self business interest he would ax the website to preserve CyberSoup's business reputation. Yes?
-
Bruce Patrick Brychek
- Posts: 1306
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Support For Mr. Wim Dankbaar, And His Family:
Dear Mr. Wim Dankbaar, and Family, and Fellow JFK Forum Supporters,
1. Character Assassination preceeds Actual Assassination.
2. Character Assassination preceeds, and only threatens Legal Action.
I write in support of My Dear Friend, Mr. Wim Dankbaar, His Family, and
Fellow JFK Forum Supporters.
I know, and have met numerous times, and have spent literally hundreds of hours with Wim in Chicago, Illinois. Wim and I have become very close,
and highly trusted friends. Wim has always been 1,000 % straight, and above board with me. Sometimes we debate some points, but always with Mutual Respect.
While I am saddened greatly by these attacks on Wim, and his family, I am not surprised because Wim is accomplishing so much.
All that any Negative Forces can do right now is to try to perform a Character Assassination on Wim. And while this is truly wrong, it is to be expected from the low life, low level methodologies of some people, and/or organizations.
I recently have warned 3 - 4 Fellow JFK Members who have offered to work with me, stating that it may not be in their best interests.
People like Wim, Dan Marvin, Judyth Vary Baker, Jimmy Files, and to a degree even myself, have all been attacked or threatened in one way or another, repeatedly.
I personally admire Wim for posting this disgusting information here on the JFK Forum. While this is certainly hard on Wim, I think that all of us should show some support for Wim, even those that don't always agree with Wim, or the Mainstream of The JFK Forum. We can debate, argue, and offer our own points of view because of Wim Dankbaar.
My personal feeling is that:
AN ATTACK ON WIM DANKBAAR IS AN ATTACK ON ALL OF US, AND THE FREEDOMS OF RESEARCH, AND SPEECH THAT WIM ALLOWS US TO ENJOY ON HIS TOTALLY FREE JFK FORUM. IF YOU HAVE AGREED, OR DISAGREED WITH WIM ON HIS FORUM, IT WAS ONLY BECAUSE WIM CREATED THIS JFK FORUM FOR ALL OF US. AND WE ARE FREE TO DO SO BECAUSE OF WIM.
Respectfully,
Bruce Patrick Brychek.
1. Character Assassination preceeds Actual Assassination.
2. Character Assassination preceeds, and only threatens Legal Action.
I write in support of My Dear Friend, Mr. Wim Dankbaar, His Family, and
Fellow JFK Forum Supporters.
I know, and have met numerous times, and have spent literally hundreds of hours with Wim in Chicago, Illinois. Wim and I have become very close,
and highly trusted friends. Wim has always been 1,000 % straight, and above board with me. Sometimes we debate some points, but always with Mutual Respect.
While I am saddened greatly by these attacks on Wim, and his family, I am not surprised because Wim is accomplishing so much.
All that any Negative Forces can do right now is to try to perform a Character Assassination on Wim. And while this is truly wrong, it is to be expected from the low life, low level methodologies of some people, and/or organizations.
I recently have warned 3 - 4 Fellow JFK Members who have offered to work with me, stating that it may not be in their best interests.
People like Wim, Dan Marvin, Judyth Vary Baker, Jimmy Files, and to a degree even myself, have all been attacked or threatened in one way or another, repeatedly.
I personally admire Wim for posting this disgusting information here on the JFK Forum. While this is certainly hard on Wim, I think that all of us should show some support for Wim, even those that don't always agree with Wim, or the Mainstream of The JFK Forum. We can debate, argue, and offer our own points of view because of Wim Dankbaar.
My personal feeling is that:
AN ATTACK ON WIM DANKBAAR IS AN ATTACK ON ALL OF US, AND THE FREEDOMS OF RESEARCH, AND SPEECH THAT WIM ALLOWS US TO ENJOY ON HIS TOTALLY FREE JFK FORUM. IF YOU HAVE AGREED, OR DISAGREED WITH WIM ON HIS FORUM, IT WAS ONLY BECAUSE WIM CREATED THIS JFK FORUM FOR ALL OF US. AND WE ARE FREE TO DO SO BECAUSE OF WIM.
Respectfully,
Bruce Patrick Brychek.