Page 2 of 4

Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 1:46 pm
by Paul van Beek
dankbaar wrote:Yes, but the crux is that the official scenario has long been 3 shots, 3 hits. This postcard shows that. It was 6 months later that they had to invent the single bullet theory, because they could no longer surpress the evidence that one shot had missed (the one that hit a curb and wounded bystander James Tague).Now they needed to explain all the wounds of two men with one shot less. Thus they invented the hoax one bullet went through both men. But few people know this was done much later. Wim There has bin also to much evidence disapeared,from that day.And from weeks and month's after the shooting to say it was a well organized govermand investegation,that should NORMALY protect evidance from disapearing.... From eyewitnesses to files and even possible killers... And do's that not in it self leave a trace,that looks like indireckt evidence...

Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 2:15 pm
by Paul van Beek
But the traces of the mercury load,would not only be in the brains of JFK... It would be incide the skull and traces could be on the clothes of Jacky.

Postcard

Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 2:59 pm
by bobwc
It would be incide the skull and traces could be on the clothes of Jacky.

Now that is a thought!!! Is there a way that this could be done. The clothes are not on public display, but they still exist.

bobwc

Re: Postcard

Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 3:05 pm
by dankbaar
bobwc wrote:It would be incide the skull and traces could be on the clothes of Jacky.Now that is a thought!!! Is there a way that this could be done. The clothes are not on public display, but they still exist.bobwc

Does anyone know where they are?

Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 4:16 pm
by john geraghty
For JohnJohn, to the best of my knowledge, Jackies dress is at the national Archives, but unavailable o the public. The dress,if I am not mistaken, was cleaned, but I have no knowledge to what extent. It does need to be analyzed for mercury traces and or other telltale signs. bobwc

John Nix on the lancer forum also says the dress is in the National Archives.
Cheers Bob,
John

Re: Postcard

Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 5:25 pm
by Jorgen Sjolen
dankbaar wrote:bobwc wrote:It would be incide the skull and traces could be on the clothes of Jacky.Now that is a thought!!! Is there a way that this could be done. The clothes are not on public display, but they still exist.bobwcDoes anyone know where they are?

I belive it was Discovery Channel that had or has a program that located things lost in history.
One of the things was Jackies Dress and if i rember right it was donated to National Archives.

http://www.newhousenews.com/archive/Rios111303.html

Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 8:46 pm
by Paul van Beek
There in the Archives, the suit remains. Stored in a custom-designed corrugated board box, it rests on a gray steel shelf in a secured area of a suburban warehouse. It has never been cleaned. The wool skirt and jacket lie flat, with a suggestion of human form created by acid-free tissue paper folded inside the sleeves.

Only recently was a deed of gift obtained from the Kennedys' sole surviving child, Caroline. But one hundred years will have to pass before the suit can again come before the American public. This condition is consistent with Mrs. Kennedy's determination to balance her obligations to history with her family's privacy. Archivists' interests, moreover, are not only the past and present, but the future.

The Archives also has JFK's jacket, shirt and tie -- exhibits in the Warren Commission investigation of the shooting.

Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 2:24 pm
by dankbaar
Here's another one:


http://jfkmurdersolved.com/images/postcard.jpg


Thanks to Wolfgang Kazzer who just sent me a clear copy.

Wim

Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 8:35 pm
by john geraghty
Wim,
Are you going to investigate the possibility of examing Jackies suit or get a professional opinion on whether anything could be found after all this time?
I thought that this would be a potential lead for you with regard to the mercury.
John

Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 8:41 pm
by dankbaar
Dear John,

What makes you think I am in better position to do that than yourself?

Wim