Barack Hussein Obama

[Dealey Joe]

Thursday, January 26, 2012OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOWBy Craig Andresen on January 26, 2012 at 9:25 amGiven the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the attorneys and the appearance of the judge.Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant to Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under the law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later, that Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court, Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate but that he would do so at his and his clients peril.Game on.5 minutes.10 minutes.15 minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s chambers.20 minutes.It appears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys return, all go to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after meeting in the judge’s chambers.Has Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to participate? Is he directly ignoring the court’s subpoena? Is he placing Obama above the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to appear in court, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or, non action?Certainly not.Court is called to order.Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.Carl Swinson takes the stand.Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.Dreams From My Father entered.Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.At this point, the judge takes a recess.The judge returns.David Farrar takes the stand.Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.State Licensed PI takes the stand.She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1979. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1979, shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.Next witness takes the stand.This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.Linda Jordan takes the stand.Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.Next witness.Mr. Gogt.Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.States this is a product of layering.Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of MA. Obama never resided in MA. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.Taitz takes the stand herself.Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.And with that, the judge closes the hearing.What can we take away from this?It’s interesting.Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records.One huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered.WHO THE HELL IS THIS GUY?Without his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his Social Security number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in question.One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under the definition of Natural Born Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to be eligible to serve as President.What will the judge decide? That is yet to be known, but it seems nearly impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence, because Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama will be allowed on the Georgia ballot.It also opens the door for such cases pending or to be brought in other states as well.Obama is in it deep and the DNC has some…a LOT…of explaining to do unless they start looking for a new candidate for 2012.

[Dealey Joe]

QUESTION: If you used a fake Social Security Number, then what would the federal government do to you?Now...don't tell me there is "law" and that we are all equal under it....I certainly will laugh. Reporting.R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed./sciencesFreelance Investigative Science Reporter++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++QUOTE“Very Interesting Bit Of Detective Work”1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.' So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is 'African-American' when the term wasn't even used at that time?2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in " Kenya , East Africa ". This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the " British East Africa Protectorate".3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital ". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?Resources:http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-chil ... t-colonial history (from Wikipedia)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of ... i/KenyaThe Plot ThickensAn intensive investigation has revealed the identity of the man whoseSocial Security number (SSN) is being used by President Obama:Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to theUnited States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (Obama'scurrent SSN) on or about March 1977.Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut . Because of that,his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select fewreserved for Connecticut residents.Obama never lived or worked in that state! Therefore, there is noreason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. Nonewhatsoever!Now comes the bestpart! Ludwig spent the final months of his life inHawaii, where he died.Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, workedpart-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, andtherefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig'sdeath, and because he never received Social Security benefits therewere no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was nota U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya or became acitizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro simply scouredthe probate records until she found someone who died who was notreceiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. LudwigsConnecticut SSN for Obama.Just wait until Trump gets past the birth certificate and ontothe issue of Barry O's use of a stolen SSN. You will see leftist headsexploding, because they will have no way of defending Obama.Although many Americans do not understand the meaning of the term "naturalborn" there are few who do not understand that if you are usingsomeone else's SSN it is a clear indication of fraud.Let's all get this information out to everybody on our mailing lists.If the voters of this great nation can succeed in bringing this lying,deceitful, cheating, corrupt, impostor to justice it will be thebiggest and best news in decades for our country and the world.**************************************************************************************************** END QUOTE

[kenmurray]

And of course you want hear none of this by the MSM. I don't hear from it much at all from the local News stations here in Ga.

[Dealey Joe]

Skinny LawyerFor all of you who have made disparaging remarks about President Obama, please read the following...I'm sure most of us have read the so-called comparison of Lincoln and Kennedy, but did you ever consider the relationship between Obama and Lincoln? You might be surprised...Parallels of Abraham Lincoln and Barack Hussein Obama:1. Lincoln placed his hand on the Bible for his inauguration. Obama used the same Bible.2. Lincoln came from Illinois . Obama comes from Illinois .3. Lincoln served in the Illinois Legislature. Obama served in the Illinois Legislature.4. Lincoln had very little experience before becoming President. Obama had very little experience before becoming President.5. Lincoln rode the train from Philadelphia to Washington for his inauguration. Obama rode the train from Philadelphia to Washington for his inauguration.6. Lincoln was a skinny lawyer. Obama is a skinny lawyer. (Both He & Michelle Were Disbarred)7. Lincoln was a Republican. Obama is a skinny lawyer.8. Lincoln was in the United States military. Obama is a skinny lawyer.9. Lincoln believed in everyone carrying their own weight. Obama is a skinny lawyer.10. Lincoln did not waste taxpayers' money on personal enjoyments. Obama is a skinny lawyer.11. Lincoln was highly respected. Obama is a skinny lawyer.12. Lincoln was born in the United States . Obama is a skinny lawyer.13. Lincoln was honest, so honest he was called Honest Abe. Obama is a skinny lawyer14. Lincoln saved the United States. Obama is a skinny lawyer.

[Dealey Joe]

Barack & Michelle Gave Up Law LicensePosted on September 16, 2010 by Dr. Eowyn | 37 CommentsDesign by bkeyser: http://www.cafepress.com/RTKArtistryIn the United States, admission to the bar by a particular court system is needed to practice law in that system. Each U.S. state and similar jurisdiction (e.g. territories under federal control) sets its own rules for bar admission (or privilege to practice law).In general, a prospective lawyer will need to pass a state-administered bar exam after earning a Juris Doctor degree from a law school approved by the state in which he/she wants to practice. Typically, there is also a character and fitness evaluation, which includes a background check. [Source]In other words, becoming a licensed attorney is an arduous process. The legal education consists of these stages:A Bachelor’s degree, often in the Pre-law majorLaw schoolTrial practiceLegal clinicGraduation with a Juris Doctor degreeThen there are the exams:The rigorous LSAT (Law School Admission Test) The even more daunting Bar Examination. (Two former students of mine, both very bright, each took the bar exam 4 to 6 times before they finally passed.)Given how arduous it is to acquire a law license, like other professionals (such as physicians), most attorneys renew their license even when they are retired from active legal work. License renewal is easy and simple: you pay a fee and, in some states, take a few units of continuing legal education. Letting your license lapse, however, means that you’d have to re-take the bar exam to get re-admitted.Lawyers let their license lapse for very compelling reasons, often to avoid or escape censure or outright criminal charges. As an example, Bill Clinton kept active his law license even when he became president. In 2000 the Arkansas Supreme Court’s Committee on Professional Conduct called for Clinton’s disbarment, saying he lied about his affair with Monica Lewinsky. In January 2001 Clinton reached an agreement under which he was ordered to pay $25,000 in fines to Arkansas state’s bar officials and his Arkansas law license was suspended for five years. The agreement came on the condition that Whitewater prosecutors would not pursue federal perjury charges against him. Clinton was suspended by the Supreme Court in October 2001, and, facing disbarment from that court, Clinton resigned from the Supreme Court bar in November.So it is most curious that Barack and Michelle Obama both gave up their law licenses.Michelle Obama attended Princeton University, graduating cum laude with a B.A. in Sociology and African-American Studies in 1985. She then attended Harvard Law School and earned a J.D. in 1988 before returning to her hometown Chicago to work at the law firm Sidley Austin where she met and was assigned to mentor a summer associate named Barack. Subsequently, she worked as part of the staff of Chicago mayor Richard M. Daley as his Assistant and as Assistant Commissioner of Planning and Development. In 1996, she became, first, the Associate Dean of Student Services at the University of Chicago; then, Vice President for Community and External Affairs.The above information on Michelle Obama is from Wikipedia. Conspicuously missing from the Wikipedia entry is the fact that she voluntarily gave up her law license.The website of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois ((https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=847688734)) says that Michelle Obama was admitted to the Illinois State Bar Association on May 12, 1989, but she is no longer authorized to practice law because she voluntarily surrendered (“voluntarily inactive”) her license on some unspecified date for unspecified reason(s).Here’s a screen shot of the ARDC page on Michelle Obama:For his part, Barack Hussein Obama was admitted to the Illinois State Bar Association on December 17, 1991. He too is no longer authorized to practice law because he had “voluntarily retired” on an unspecified date for unspecified reason(s).Here’s a screen shot of the ARDC page (https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=596550107) on Barack Obama:According to bloggers Johnny Alamo and James4America, Michelle “voluntarily” gave up her law license in 1993, just five years after she got the license; Barack “voluntarily retired” from law practice in 2007. The left-leaning Snopes.com denies that Michelle had “voluntarily surrendered” her law license, and insists both Michelle and Barack had merely put their law license on “inactive” status. Snopes, however, does not explain what’s the difference between Michelle’s “voluntarily inactive” and Barack’s “voluntarily retired.”Nor does Snopes inform its readers that Michelle Obama was ordered by the court to put her law license on inactive status. An earlier version of the ARDC webpage on her (https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=847688734) said this about Michelle: “No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status.” Here’s a screen shot of the web page at the time of Chelsea Shilling’s WorldNetDaily article of August 4, 2009:By the time I accessed the same webpage yesterday, September 15, 2010, the sentence “No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status” had disappeared. A day later, that webpage (https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=847688734) is scrubbed of all information on Michelle Obama. See my update, “Illinois Supreme Court Coverup For Obamas.”

[Dealey Joe]

Michelle's license to practice law is on "Court Ordered" Inactive status...after holding it for less than 4 years. Why? Barry Dunham, aka Barry Saetoro, aka Barack Obama, aka Barry Obama "voluntarily" gave up his license to avoid an investigation. On the application it asks if that person has ever used or been known by another name. President Obama stated "No". Barry has used several names...publicly. Since Barack LIED on his application -- he could try to keep it and be investigated -- OR -- if he volunteered to make it inactive, there would be no further action taken. (Obama chose the latter option.)Michelle was "ordered by the court" to change her law license to "Inactive" in 1993. This status prevents further investigation from being listed on her personal records.

[Dealey Joe]

Michelle hasn't practiced law since 1993. Why didn't we know about this before the election? source:atlashrugs First off, the biggest as8*s-kissing media refers to Michelle Obama as a 'distinguished attorney" despite the fact that Michelle Obama has been"inactive" since 1993. Click here: ARDC | Lawyer Search ARDC - Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois ! Click to enlarge image. Everyday another Obama skeleton comes careening out of the closet. This ADRC is for discipline reasons...not for those volunteering to stop practicing. It is COURT ORDERED...not "Michelle Obama ordered." Their website is very clear about their function and why they step in. (see below) If this was a Republican, the Dems would have her up on charges already. Schmoo, an attorney, points out, "sounds more to me like she was drummed right out of the practice of law. I am just dying to know what she did... she ran to have a court ordered inactive status done...and then no malpractice report needed to be provided. She wanted this to 'go away" fast and furious and the details not come out in depositions, courtroom documents, rulings for the client/plaintiffs...etc.. I would love to know what she did. I believe barack himself was also disciplined--I know his law license is on "inactive" he lied about ever going by any other names when he applied for bar application. He also failed to state any prior drug use...(which he admitted in his books...and he had outstanding tickets that were never paid)." Michelle Obama on court ordered inactive status with the Illinois State Attorney hat tip schmoopett huh? Michelle Obama is on COURT ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS--order said since she has been placed INACTIVE that "no malpractice record required." WHAT DID SHE DO THAT in 1993 -- AFTER only 4 YEARS -- HER LICENSE to PRACTICE LAW WAS REVIEWED AND PUT ON INACTIVE by a DISCIPLINARY AGENCY? What Is the ARDC? (this is NOT the Illinois Bar-where one can voluntarily be inactive) As our name implies, the ARDC is the agency of the Supreme Court of Illinois which registers attorneys and investigates complaints of misconduct filed against attorneys holding a license to practice law in Illinois. Our principal purpose is to assist the Supreme Court to determine a lawyer's fitness to practice law in Illinois. If a complaint is made that an attorney, licensed to practice law in Illinois, has engaged in illegal, unethical or dishonest conduct, we will investigate and, if warranted, bring formal disciplinary charges. The Supreme Court of Illinois will then ultimately decide if a lawyer should be censured (publicly rebuked), suspended (having the law license to practice either taken away for a certain period of time or placed on a probationary period) or disbarred

[Dealey Joe]

My or my....and click on the links to verify & comments..Very interesting info here... Eventually the truth will come out...how long will it take?? Good question. And the real truth continues to come to light.THE LAWYER OBAMA, WHAT A JOKE![Ed. note on the Ed. note: this is from a former Chicago lawyer now practicing law in Tyler, TX][Ed. note: This is legit. I checked it out myself at[size=https://www.iardc.org] Stands for Illinois Attorney Registration And Disciplinary Committee. It's the official arm of lawyer discipline in Illinois; and they are very strict and mean as hell. (Talk about irony!) Even I, at the advanced age of almost 65, maintain (at the cost of approximately $600/year) my law license that I worked so hard and long to earn.]Big surprise !!! Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and US President Makes Up Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address.Consider this:1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew your license. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender" you license five seconds before the state suspends you.2. Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993. 3. So, we have the first black President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law. Facts. Source: [size=http://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/ ... w-license/]4. A senior lecturer is one thing... A fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University ofChicago . 5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 sayingSen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school-but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008. 6. "He did not hold the title of professor of law," said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at theUniversity of Chicago School of Law . Source:http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/03 ... title.html ;7. The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the US Constitution the other night during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence . not the Constitution. 8. The B-Cast posted the video: http://www.breitbart.tv/did-obama-confu ... pendence/9. Free Republic: In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: "We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal.. 10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Champ, I mean Mr. President. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech??? When you are a phony it's hard to keep facts straight.

[Dealey Joe]

http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/o ... n-1823551/

[Dealey Joe]

What could Obama do that if he was a lawyer cause him legal problems?any lawyers in the crowd?