It is not I....
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:30 pm
It is not I that would have it all one way or the other. YOU would blame
secret societies, rather than face your government's own encroachments
upon the Constitution and its adherents.
You do this to construct a narrow focus for some reason, rather than to
examine each single incident of abuse with its own particular evidence. No,
you simply write it off to the boogey man "secret society" without engaging
in the actual and knowable history attached to how your GOVERNMENT got
so absurdly tied up in its own shoe-laces.
Let's start with the Hughe's Corporation. Know anything about that? Of course I could go into a mountain of details and we would still come back to your fixation on the boogey man. You are ignoring the substance of everything I've presented to fasten on an argument that goes nowhere even if your were proved right. The reason for that is that once you dispense with the Masonic hooks into government, they would be replaced by someone else's.
You fix the problem by strict and severe oversight of the GOVERNMENT, not
the would-be denizens that can go only as far as the instrument of GOVERNMENT allows them.
Had Earl Warren, J. Edgar Hoover, CIA Director Bush, Richard Nixon and
his dirty tricks people really been opened up and revealed to the Ameican
people, treason and murder would have been the subsequent appropriate
charges. You have any idea how far that would have gone to "clean up"
systemic narcissism?
Now before you go into your little song and dance about what they belonged to, think about all those other affiliations they have as well.
In many cases it is the engraver of a calling card you are trying to convict
simply because that calling card was found at the scene of the crime.
Yours is the backwards methodolgy of police today when they try and
win indictments against organized crime. They go after stoolies (they have
to subsequently support for the rest of their lives) to win indictments
against bosses. Only you want to make a belief out of it.
But here we can get them all, all those that have participated or protected
while in the public trust....by starting at the top on the basis of charges of
betraying the oath. It will take you the rest of the way, catching all the
mice feeding on the crumbs even, of the cheese the rats stole.
Or, are you afraid of that?
JCH
secret societies, rather than face your government's own encroachments
upon the Constitution and its adherents.
You do this to construct a narrow focus for some reason, rather than to
examine each single incident of abuse with its own particular evidence. No,
you simply write it off to the boogey man "secret society" without engaging
in the actual and knowable history attached to how your GOVERNMENT got
so absurdly tied up in its own shoe-laces.
Let's start with the Hughe's Corporation. Know anything about that? Of course I could go into a mountain of details and we would still come back to your fixation on the boogey man. You are ignoring the substance of everything I've presented to fasten on an argument that goes nowhere even if your were proved right. The reason for that is that once you dispense with the Masonic hooks into government, they would be replaced by someone else's.
You fix the problem by strict and severe oversight of the GOVERNMENT, not
the would-be denizens that can go only as far as the instrument of GOVERNMENT allows them.
Had Earl Warren, J. Edgar Hoover, CIA Director Bush, Richard Nixon and
his dirty tricks people really been opened up and revealed to the Ameican
people, treason and murder would have been the subsequent appropriate
charges. You have any idea how far that would have gone to "clean up"
systemic narcissism?
Now before you go into your little song and dance about what they belonged to, think about all those other affiliations they have as well.
In many cases it is the engraver of a calling card you are trying to convict
simply because that calling card was found at the scene of the crime.
Yours is the backwards methodolgy of police today when they try and
win indictments against organized crime. They go after stoolies (they have
to subsequently support for the rest of their lives) to win indictments
against bosses. Only you want to make a belief out of it.
But here we can get them all, all those that have participated or protected
while in the public trust....by starting at the top on the basis of charges of
betraying the oath. It will take you the rest of the way, catching all the
mice feeding on the crumbs even, of the cheese the rats stole.
Or, are you afraid of that?
JCH