JFK RFK MLK Assasination Forum - Archive

Ban this guy. I'm really tired of his acerbic postings. Different points of view are fine but he doesn't post without trying to incite a fight.

I'm sure he can find another forum in which to spew his venom...

RC

Dan wrote:I brought up race because little Johnny was ranting about white men in another thread. Why delete it - because I had a better ending that would spin him in a direction that would be more entertaining. You can play little johnny like an old NWA LP in Compton.Bob, I have never posted disinformation. You and emoticon boy are the cut and paste disinformation masters (spammers).

Dan-----I am not posting dis-information...I am connecting dots and showing definite links to the JFK Murder with my posts which are full of crucial infomation....

WHAT EXACTLY IS YOUR LAST NAME DAN ?...

Paul Pennyworth wrote:Dan wrote:I brought up race because little Johnny was ranting about white men in another thread. Why delete it - because I had a better ending that would spin him in a direction that would be more entertaining. You can play little johnny like an old NWA LP in Compton.Bob, I have never posted disinformation. You and emoticon boy are the cut and paste disinformation masters (spammers).Dan-----I am not posting dis-information...I am connecting dots and showing definite links to the JFK Murder with my posts which are full of crucial infomation....WHAT EXACTLY IS YOUR LAST NAME DAN ?...

Dan,

We'd like to know a little bit about you for our files (No pun intended )

Are you under stress or in distress now?..tell us about it...
Hooo exactly R U? What town in Texas do you reside in???

What do you do for a living?

Since I do not check in as regularly as I used to, I was not aware that Dan is considered a pain in the but by the majority of members.

I found this statement by Dan:


Many federal criminal investigators have been brought to this site. There are too many factual errors in the text of the site (see Boggs info, Rademacher info, Bothun 4 info, etc) and just outright lies posted by various members of this forum that nobody is going to waste time or be red faced in asking their SAIC or BC for time to probe this. While I believe in some of what Files says - the lies posted in the forum are so easily debunked with little effort that it shoots down the legitimate parts of the Files story.


Dan, could you tell me what you mean with "Boggs info, Rademacher info, Bothun 4 info" and what is not factual about it? Have you ever send me an email to point out the errors as perceived by you?

Which many federal criminal investigators have been brought to this website that were not impressed with the content? Do you have names, places and dates?

TIA

Wim

I will send you an email this evening. Yes, I have raised the Boggs factual errors many times before.

Richard Carter wrote:Ban this guy. I'm really tired of his acerbic postings. Different points of view are fine but he doesn't post without trying to incite a fight.I'm sure he can find another forum in which to spew his venom... RC

Now there is an acerbic post!

Looks like you incited a fight with that one!

I have looked at some recent exchanges with Dan. It seems Dan fits the definition of an Internet troll

An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial and usually irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, with the intention of baiting other users into an emotional response[1] or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

Right?

Dan, what is your purpose here? Members are obviously not happy with you. Why would you want to participate in a hostile environment

Do you actually believe James Files was the grassy knoll shooter? Or do you just not believe that the dented shell casing found by Rademacher was the one he used in 1963?

Wim

If I am considered a pain in the butt then I have succeeded in bringing some truth to the disinformation trolls that live on this forum. If six is a majority then there are bigger problems than my posts that need solved here.

I strongly believe in James Files. The Rademacher cartiridges have been conclusively proven to be bogus, but that raises an interesting question. Who put them there, why, how did they know to bite them, etc?

I will send you an email in a few hours with the Hale Boggs info, and some other pertinent info about SA's I know visiting this forum.

If I want to act like cry baby Crocksferd I would also present the list of threats and insults I have received - but I can fight my own battles.

No matter if it is only 6. The fact is there is none for your side. You didn't even vote for yourself? Damn dan. You know you don't even want yourself here. LMAO

RC, you gave me some good advice awhile back. You told me not to respond to Dan. I didn't listen, and look where it has evolved. Well, I'm listening now, I am NEVER going to respond to him again. He can join in a thread, I don't care, but I will never DIRECTLY respond to him again. I don't care if he tries to be the troll/disinformant that he is and insults me, as per usual. My advice to you is the same advice you offered me once.