Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

[ThomZajac]

How much would it take?

[ChristophMessner]

Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote: Wait, does that mean I shouldn't call him Mack the Sack? That is not an easy question to answer for me. Although I think his opportunism deserved to feel contempt of truthers and recently I told Wim, that in German "er hat 'ne Macke" means "he is not quite right in his head", I do now think it is wrong to speak about anybody this way, because insult does not lead to anything constructive. So no, you should not call him this way. I hope you understand that this is no defense of his position.

[Bob]

ChristophMessner wrote:Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote: Wait, does that mean I shouldn't call him Mack the Sack? That is not an easy question to answer for me. Although I think his opportunism deserved to feel contempt of truthers and recently I told Wim, that in German "er hat 'ne Macke" means "he is not quite right in his head", I do now think it is wrong to speak about anybody this way, because insult does not lead to anything constructive. So no, you should not call him this way. I hope you understand that this is no defense of his position.I understand where you are coming from Chris. However, the lies that we have seen here perpetrated in the United States in the MSM by Mack via the Discovery channel etc., get people a little riled up. Also, the U.S. is a country that loves nicknames for people. For anyone. Presidents...politicians...athletes...celebrities...friends...you name it.

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

kenmurray wrote:Pasquale, yes you can. There is plenty of "hard evidence" that Gary is "Mack The Sack" You just made me literally laugh out loud! Good one!

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

ChristophMessner wrote:Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote: Wait, does that mean I shouldn't call him Mack the Sack? That is not an easy question to answer for me. Although I think his opportunism deserved to feel contempt of truthers and recently I told Wim, that in German "er hat 'ne Macke" means "he is not quite right in his head", I do now think it is wrong to speak about anybody this way, because insult does not lead to anything constructive. So no, you should not call him this way. I hope you understand that this is no defense of his position.My sense of humor betrays me sometimes. I find that it helps my blood pressure.Anyway, my asking was more of a joke question than anything else...just another reason to say his nickname again. For the sake of keeping things civil, I'll pull it in a notch. Christoph, to "pull it in a notch" means to tone down the insulting nicknames just a little. No promises though, because if I see Mack again on the television spewing more disinformation, I might have a relapse! LOL

[ThomZajac]

When you are in a generous mood, you can call him Gary Hack.

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

ThomZajac wrote:When you are in a generous mood, you can call him Gary Hack.Good one.Conversely, if I'm in a not-so-generous mood, I'll just call him The Sack! LMAO

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

This topic is an excellent discussion about Gary Mack and his notion of "hard evidence."

[Phil Dragoo]

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

Good one, Phil!You're giving Mack-the-salty-sack too much credit.He only gains ground because of his disinformation.We can fight him at his own game. We need to press the issue here and everywhere else about his nonsense.