Page 13 of 23
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:19 am
by Pasquale DiFabrizio
kenmurray wrote:Pasquale, I know what you mean by those shoes. I guess the MSM wants us to believe that the bodies disintergrated. I guess so. LOL I'm kind of getting a laugh out of the image...plane crashing into a building and a bunch of shoes raining down on the pavement. WTF?
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 10:33 am
by Dealey Joe
Didn't you see the blood on the walk there?
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 12:22 pm
by Jsnow915
I will say....the bag the officer is holding doesnt match his shoes
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 4:14 pm
by Bob
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 5:55 pm
by Pasquale DiFabrizio
Dealey Joe wrote:Didn't you see the blood on the walk there? Is it blood? I guess it might be.
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 5:56 pm
by Pasquale DiFabrizio
Jsnow915 wrote:I will say....the bag the officer is holding doesnt match his shoes HA HA HA HA!!!!
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:31 pm
by Pasquale DiFabrizio
Bob wrote:Check out this very interesting blog...
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/03 ... htmlThat's some good information there, Bob.Regarding the O'Neil issue, I'm open to the possibility. Also, regarding no plane hitting the Pentagon, it certainly coincides with the no-plane issue regarding WTC 7. I'm fairly certain that whatever did (or did not) hit the twin towers was NOT what the mainstream media (and those amateur videos) showed us on TV. Good stuff!
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:57 pm
by Deborah
Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:Bob wrote:Check out this very interesting blog...
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/03 ... htmlThat's some good information there, Bob.Regarding the O'Neil issue, I'm open to the possibility. Also, regarding no plane hitting the Pentagon, it certainly coincides with the no-plane issue regarding WTC 7. I'm fairly certain that whatever did (or did not) hit the twin towers was NOT what the mainstream media (and those amateur videos) showed us on TV. Good stuff!You may wish to note the historical knowledge of the outspoken Russian nuclear professional Dimitri Khalezov
http://www.dkhalezov.com Deborah
The Destruction Of WTC 7
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 1:45 pm
by kenmurray
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:26 am
by Pasquale DiFabrizio
Deborah wrote:Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:Bob wrote:Check out this very interesting blog...
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/03 ... htmlThat's some good information there, Bob.Regarding the O'Neil issue, I'm open to the possibility. Also, regarding no plane hitting the Pentagon, it certainly coincides with the no-plane issue regarding WTC 7. I'm fairly certain that whatever did (or did not) hit the twin towers was NOT what the mainstream media (and those amateur videos) showed us on TV. Good stuff!You may wish to note the historical knowledge of the outspoken Russian nuclear professional Dimitri Khalezov
http://www.dkhalezov.com DeborahDeborah,That's some good information you just posted. I'm still looking at it.The "nano-thermite" idea is something I'm having a problem with. I think the "nano-thermite" is a false lead. Some 9/11 truthers even talk about the supposed "nano-thermite" being painted on. It doesn't make any sense to me. I suspect that very non conventional explosives were used and perhaps in addition to the standard explosives used in controlled demolitions.Anywa, that's some good stuff you posted.