So, the topic of this thread is about Israeli involvement in 9/11 and their excessive spying on the U.S.The topic got a little sidetracked with information that you can look at that basically is evidence to the idea that international Zionists (as opposed to anti-Zionist Jewish people) most likely used their domination over the media to create the supposed Holocaust myth.I am not kidding, and this is for real. I have posted information that even the Auschwitz authorities have REDUCED the number of dead at that camp from 4 million to 1.5 million, and yet even people like Martin Hinrichs still throw around the magic "six million Jews" number. Why is that? He can't be serious. Martin Hinrichs called me names, showed pictures of dead bodies, showed a picture of Anne Frank's grave, and called me insane. He also insinuated that I'm talking like a Neo-Nazi.What Martin Hinrichs has NOT done is address the facts. How does someone like Martin Hinrichs explain the magic "six million Jews" number when the Auschwitz authorities CHANGED that number from 4 million to 1.5 million? Martin Hinrichs hasn't said a word. What he DID do at first, is make it sound like the difference in numbers was marginal. Then he speculated that I hold my opinions because of Fetzer. Why would he do that? Is he, Martin, all about the truth, or is he having a reflex reaction? I'm not necessarily saying that Martin Hinrichs is a disinformation agent or whatever, but when he doesn't present information and calls people names or insinuates that I could be called a "Neo Nazi," he is engaging in disinformation tactics. It's really that simple. Isn't he the one who had the private discussion with Beckham? You all remember him, don't you? Who is he really, Martin, that is? When he posted the picture of Anne Frank's grave, what was that supposed to prove? It's like he was sitting there at his computer saying "Can't you see Anne Frank's grave? What more proof do you need?" Um...that's a bunch of bulls**t, and he knows it. I also asked him to verify whether it is against the law in Germany to deny or question publicly the supposed holocaust. It is my understanding that it is not only against the law in Germany to publicly deny or question the supposed holocaust but that it is also against the law to even dress (even if it's for a costume party) in a NAZI uniform or publicly display a picture of Hitler. That is called a CONTROLLED SOCIETY. It seems that "they" are trying to do that to us in the United States as well, so we need to value and protect our free speech here. What would you or other people in other countries think if there was a law against publicly speaking against the official story regarding the JFK assassination or 9/11? What if you could be jailed and or fined for speaking and writing anything OTHER than official stories? This IS the case in Germany, and Martin won't even address it. Interesting eh?Imagine that! Martin Hinrichs lives in a country, Germany, where you can be arrested and fined and/or jailed for questioning the Holocaust on a forum like this one. Based on his excited and exaggerated reaction to me, I certainly do suspect that he's Jewish. It really doesn't matter to me because I am not an anti-Semite, but I suspect that he's liar. Do you expect an honest debate with him on this issue?I am putting him under the spotlight almost specifically because he exhibited poor character when he called me names, and yet he does not have the common respect or backbone (or the information, it seems) to actually address the facts. How open minded is he? On that note, I am sharing even more information that is evidence regarding the Holocaust being a hoax. After all, if international Zionists like the Israelis can put on false-flag operations regarding the "Lavon Affair," the USS Liberty attack, and 9/11, what makes you think that the holocaust is off-limits to examination? What makes you think that they didn't have a hand in the JFK assassination? Keep in mind that there is no evidence of Jews being gassed to death in WWII concentration camps. I never doubted that Jews were killed in mass numbers along with other people as well, in mass numbers, but not one document or picture shows that Jews were intended to be exterminated as a race by the Germans. We only have supposed confessions and supposed witness statements.Here is a memo (a picture of it is below in German, so Martin Hinrichs should be able to read it) written by Major MillerCommanding officer,Allied Military Police Vienna. I put the text below in English. It is memo number 31/48, dated 01-10-1948. What is interesting about the memo is that he writes "In all cases where gassings were alleged, it could be proven that torture had been used to extract confessions and witnesses have lied.Any former inmate who, during their debriefing continues to allege that poison gas was used to murder people (in particular jews), are to be reported to this office and if they insist on lying further, they are to be charged with perjury." ALLIED MILITARY POLICE HQVIENNA1.10.1948MEMO Nr:31/48The Allied Committee of Inquiry has to date proven that no poison gas was ever used to kill prisoners in the following concentration camps Bergen-belsen, Buchenwald, Dachau, Flassenburg, Gross-Rosen, Mathausen, and satellite camps Natzweiler, Neuengamme Niederhagen (Wewelsburg, ravensbruck, Sachsenhausen, Stutthol, Thereselenstadt.In all cases where gassings were alleged, it could be proven that torture had been used to extract confessions and witnesses have lied.Any former inmate who, during their debriefing continues to allege that poison gas was used to murder people (in particular jews), are to be reported to this office and if they insist on lying further, they are to be charged with perjury.Signed Major MillerCommanding officerAllied Military Police Vienna:witnessed byLieutenant [Emil] Lachout MPHere is the link to the page with the memo on it.
http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2009/09 ... rdities/If you scroll down the page, you will find YouTube links showing an American Jewish historian who went to Auschwitz and also has the same questions and conclusions regarding the supposed Holocaust. Is this Jewish man, David Cole, an anti-Semite too? If you ask Martin Hinrichs, he'd probably say that he is, but then again, what has Martin Hinrichs really proved or shown here?