Page 5 of 6

Re: Zapruder Film Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 6:35 am
by neab
ThomZajac wrote:I've asked this before, so forgive me...What evidence do we really have that JFK was struck from behind?The back wound wound seem to cinch it except for the facts that it wasn't observed at Parkland and that Humes himself suspected that it was not a true gunshot wound.Mind you, I'm not saying that there is no evidence that a shot or shots were fired from behind- at least one was necessary to implicate Oswald (and perhaps divert attention). But there is no medical evidence from Parkland to support a rear entry anywhere.Yes, I know there is the Files' account, but that certainly cannot be considered conclusive,And there is the Zapruder film, also not conclusive (and as I have expressed before, I think it is clear that the Zapruder film has been altered by the conspirators).Here is my point; while it can be said with absolute certainty that the president was struck by a shot fired from in front (Parkland testimony is overwhelming for starters), the same CANNOT be said about him being struck by a shot fired from behind. Maybe he was. But based on the skimpy evidence that exists, such a 'conclusion' would have to be considered speculation rather than fact, in my humble opinion.Pretty sure there was at LEAST 1 shot from behind, I remember reading at least 1 person in the car behind jfk's claiming he saw the shot in the back from the rear. I don't remember the name, but rossley was quoting it from warren commission testimony in a debate for evidence that they moved the wound up...

Re: Zapruder Film Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 4:46 pm
by tom jeffers
[quote][/quote]this is a must read on the provinance of the zapruder filmhttp://www.assassinationresearch.com/v3n2/v3n2dellarosa.pdf

Re: Zapruder Film Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 6:16 pm
by Pasquale DiFabrizio
tom jeffers wrote:this is a must read on the provinance of the zapruder filmhttp://www.assassinationresearch.com/v3n2/v3n2 ... nteresting stuff on Zapruder in that link too.The makers of Missing Links, a documentary on 9/11 and Israeli connections, reference Jewish organized crime as basically being behind 9/11. You've seen my links before.The interesting part is that they also suggested that the Jewish mafia was also heavily involved in the JFK assassination. It might sound weird to some, until you start to think about the connections.Myer Lansky as referenced by Chauncey Holt, then we have mob-connected Jack Ruby whose ethnicity is obvious, and Zapruder who is also of the same ethnicity but who also has those connections to DeMorenschildt, etc.What do you think?

Re: Zapruder Film Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 9:03 pm
by bob franklin
Hate to say it, but there does seem to be an inordinate number of Jewish names connected to this case. Not glaringly so, but enough that it's made me wonder on more than a few occasions about this. No smoke without fire.

Re: Zapruder Film Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 9:20 pm
by Pasquale DiFabrizio
bob franklin wrote:Hate to say it, but there does seem to be an inordinate number of Jewish names connected to this case. Not glaringly so, but enough that it's made me wonder on more than a few occasions about this. No smoke without fire.For the sake of anybody reading this who IS Jewish, this is about Jewish ORGANIZED CRIME. It does exist. They even made a movie about it with Robert DeNiro and James Woods called Once Upon A Time In America. It's the same as acknowledging Italian organized crime without saying that Italians are bad people as a whole. (Being of Italian ethnicity, I see a joke in their somewhere. LOL)In any event, based on the information that I have read and researched, from the documentaries "9/11 Mysteries" and "Missing Links" and other research, there is simply no better label I can think of for this mysterious group.

Re: Zapruder Film Discussion

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:52 am
by kenmurray
Jewish organized crime has existed for a long time. Here is one of their more famous gangs:http://www.j-grit.com/criminals-the-purple-gang.php

Re: Zapruder Film Discussion

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:46 pm
by Pasquale DiFabrizio
kenmurray wrote:Jewish organized crime has existed for a long time. Here is one of their more famous gangs:http://www.j-grit.com/criminals-the-pur ... .phpHere's a more recent example. This is from July 2009 where arrests were made including mayors and rabbis in a money laundering operation that included the sale of human kidneys. The "foreign country" they're referring to is Israel. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/24/nyreg ... _r=1Here's another news story on it. These men that were arrested were connected to Israel and Switzerland. I initially wrote "Swiss bankers," but I edited my post. http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/07/23/new ... index.html

Re: Zapruder Film Discussion

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:14 am
by ThomZajac
I will present more evidence soon, but at the moment I am wrestling a few alligators......

Re: Zapruder Film Discussion

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:54 am
by kenmurray
ThomZajac wrote:I will present more evidence soon, but at the moment I am wrestling a few alligators......Thom, wrestling a few alligators is much better than wrestling a few crocs.

Re: Zapruder Film Discussion

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 4:43 pm
by ThomZajac
Depends on their size and how long it's been since they've eaten.But, yes, crocs are nastier, all things being equal. Does that sound to you like a classic forum response regarding 'facts'?