Gary Mack-isms

[John Beckham]

i seriously doubt Gary Mack would ever post here. it's a no win situation for him to argue this over and over....as far as being cordial, that has not been demonstrated here!

[Jsnow915]

John...first off...it's goo-goo ga joob...coo-coo would mean its a rooster...not a walrus...plus Magical Mystery Tour has the lyrics...(lol)...I think Gary Mack has swayed you to beleive the words were different but there not...(sorry...I know I'm a wise ass)...I respect Gary Mack for what he's done for "the conspiracy"...I understand he's changed his veiws on things...which he's allowed to...he's studying this mess the same way we are...more power to him...ok...up next...the Paul Is Dead theory.

[Bob]

"I buried Paul..."

[John Beckham]

Paul is dead theory...was it Lee or Files? i know your a wise ass, like me! (i like your avatar). but, you need to understand that the CIA and others conspired and changed Lennon's lyrics to cover the whole truth about the rooster!

[Jsnow915]

Bob...its actually"cranberry sauce"...don't get me started on Beatles...otherwise this whole forum is gonna change to the John Lennon cover-up

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

conspiracybuff wrote:i seriously doubt Gary Mack would ever post here. it's a no win situation for him to argue this over and over....as far as being cordial, that has not been demonstrated here!That's not true. If he can REASONABLY state his case, I don't think any one of us would start becoming hostile. I even gave him a break by boiling it down to his definition of "hard facts." This Mack thing is important because he seems to be doing the REVERSE of what we're trying to do here. He's dis-informing.

[John Beckham]

Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:conspiracybuff wrote:i seriously doubt Gary Mack would ever post here. it's a no win situation for him to argue this over and over....as far as being cordial, that has not been demonstrated here!That's not true. If he can REASONABLY state his case, I don't think any one of us would start becoming hostile. I even gave him a break by boiling it down to his definition of "hard facts." This Mack thing is important because he seems to be doing the REVERSE of what we're trying to do here. He's dis-informing.Pasquale, do you actually believe that? i would LOVE all kinds of people to speak their opinion here. a forum that actually discusses logically. but, personally, and from experience, that has NOT been the case! and, if you read the thread, it's NOT welcome!!! dis-informing, he's got an opinion. and you see where that's got me just by talking to him! we need to get to business, and open our hearts to others to make this forum what it should be...

[Bob]

John, I have never posted on ANY other JFK assassination forums, but I have visited almost all them to read. And without a doubt, this forum is the best in terms of open discussion and the best in terms of friendliness. Yes, we have had some disinformation types in this forum in the past, and yes the tone gets a little heated at times, but overall this is clearly the best forum to talk about all sides. Example, there are a LOT of anti-Jimmy Files theory people that come on and voice their opinion. They are not quickly quieted or banished. I have said many times, that even if you don't believe the Files angle, the site the Wim has put together is a virtual library in terms of the JFK assassination information he has put together. I believe the forum as well has uncovered some interesting facts too.

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

conspiracybuff wrote:Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:conspiracybuff wrote:i seriously doubt Gary Mack would ever post here. it's a no win situation for him to argue this over and over....as far as being cordial, that has not been demonstrated here!That's not true. If he can REASONABLY state his case, I don't think any one of us would start becoming hostile. I even gave him a break by boiling it down to his definition of "hard facts." This Mack thing is important because he seems to be doing the REVERSE of what we're trying to do here. He's dis-informing.Pasquale, do you actually believe that? i would LOVE all kinds of people to speak their opinion here. a forum that actually discusses logically. but, personally, and from experience, that has NOT been the case! and, if you read the thread, it's NOT welcome!!! dis-informing, he's got an opinion. and you see where that's got me just by talking to him! we need to get to business, and open our hearts to others to make this forum what it should be...Do I believe that he's DIS-informing? Yes. Do I think he's doing it for his job as curator of the 6th Floor Museum? Probably. You see, when he makes comments to Wim to the effect that it's a THEORY that the Warren Report is wrong...that's an outrageous statement. The Warren Report itself bases it's most crucial evidence on THEORY...like the magic bullet. Mack is acting like he learned nothing about the assassination in the last twenty years with comments like that. I mean, really..."hard facts?" What DOES he mean by that?There are harder facts supporting a shot from the front than there are anything else.

[John Beckham]

Bob wrote:John, I have never posted on ANY other JFK assassination forums, but I have visited almost all them to read. And without a doubt, this forum is the best in terms of open discussion and the best in terms of friendliness. Yes, we have had some disinformation types in this forum in the past, and yes the tone gets a little heated at times, but overall this is clearly the best forum to talk about all sides. Example, there are a LOT of anti-Jimmy Files theory people that come on and voice their opinion. They are not quickly quieted or banished. I have said many times, that even if you don't believe the Files angle, the site the Wim has put together is a virtual library in terms of the JFK assassination information he has put together. I believe the forum as well has uncovered some interesting facts too.Bob, i DO care about this forum. but, my problem is we're NOT finding out ANYTHING! i want this place to become open, no attacks (as i am guilty of too) but a forum that remains in a LOGIC view. more people would join. more opinions and facts would be learned. i wish to just stick to facts and try to solve this. but, the definition of "facts" has also come under fire. sometimes it feels like we're the "People's Front of Judea" and that doesn't sit well with me.