Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11

[kenmurray]

For those that believe in the 9/11 Omission Report of the events of 9/11, here is my question to you. Do you actually believe the Govt's version that WTC 7 collapse due to a fire caused by debris?Check this out:http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc7.html

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

kenmurray wrote:For those that believe in the 9/11 Omission Report of the events of 9/11, here is my question to you. Do you actually believe the Govt's version that WTC 7 collapse due to a fire caused by debris?Check this out:http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc7.htmlTo add to what Ken wrote, if anyone actually believes that Bin Laden and Muslim terrorists were able to also rig those buildings with explosives, get past all the security without being noticed, etc., you're dreaming.For the record, building 7 housed the mayor's emergency bunker as well as various government offices. Whoever rigged those buildings to come down, they were not Muslim terrorists.

[kenmurray]

Pasquale, obviously Mr. Hidell, or whomever, thinks that is the case and that we should quit publishing this nonsense lol.

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

kenmurray wrote:Pasquale, obviously Mr. Hidell, or whomever, thinks that is the case and that we should quit publishing this nonsense lol.Ken,Quit publishing our stuff? Like that's going to happen!

[kenmurray]

Your right Pasquale. We will not stop. Why Hijackers Into The Pentagon Story Can't Fly:http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/20 ... f-fantasy/

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

Take a look at this analysis. I posted pictures from it below.Look at the different trajectories of what is supposed to be the same plane. Also note that the background is gone in one of the videos. In the video where the background is gone a large commercial plane appears, and in the other one it's not a large commercial plane. It looks like a ball. Interesting eh?How's that for a reality check? LOL http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4Hw8sJE3R0

[kenmurray]

In 1963. we had a Magic bullet. On 9/11/2001 we had Magic planes with different trajectories. Makes perfect sense to me.

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

kenmurray wrote:In 1963. we had a Magic bullet. On 9/11/2001 we had Magic planes with different trajectories. Makes perfect sense to me. Exactly! Of course, we aim to please, so here is yet another analysis. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc0E6wTgb5QI attached pictures below for comparison of the different plane trajectories of the supposed second plane that hit. We're not making this stuff up.

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

WHAT DIRECTION DID THAT SECOND PLANE COME FROM? The smoke from the first tower to be hit, the North Tower, was traveling in the direction of the South Tower at the time of the second plane's impact on the South Tower.Using the direction of the smoke as a point of reference, you can clearly see that the perpeTRAITORS did not coordinate well with each other when they tried to show us "real" video of the second plane that hit the south tower of the WTC.See the pics below to see what I mean. Here is the link to the video for your reference. I did place red arrows to show the planes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lKZqqSI9-sIn the bottom picture, the smoke is traveling away from the camera (toward the South Tower), and the plane is coming from the right.In the middle picture, the smoke is traveling to the left, in the direction of the South Tower again, and the plane is STILL coming from the right. In the top picture, the smoke is traveling away from the camera and toward the South Tower, but NOW the plane is coming TOWARD the camera to hit the south tower.

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

Nothing exceeds like excess. In one picture below, we have the plane coming at the South Tower at a angle from above. In the other picture we see the plane coming in almost horizontally. Look for yourselves. Here's the link so you can watch the video for yourself. I did place red arrows in the pictures to point to the supposed planes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lKZqqSI9-s