JAMES FILES TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS . . . ET AL

JFK Assassination
JFKJF
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

JAMES FILES TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS . . . ET AL

Post by JFKJF »

James Files is not a demented, twisted, lone nut serial killer. He is no different from any other present day operator taking care of business for his government, whether in uniform or out of uniform. At this moment, there are men trained and waiting the call to do the same that James Files was called to do. Nothing will ever change that. Colonel Marvin, amongst a myriad of others, was asked to do a similar task. The odds are that someone like a JFK would show up in the office of the presidency and make all the wrong moves. Most people only saw the public side of JFK and what the accepted press reported; young president, rich family, humorous, pretty wife, cute children, etc . . . In reality, we didn't see the behind the scenes life. There is a saying, if you saw what went on in a slaughterhouse, you would never eat meat again. JFK lacked discretion with a capital D. JFK was an adulterer. JFK also had hatred and murder in his heart for his adversaries, both foreign and domestic, and was hated likewise in return. Here we have two of them, JFK and RFK on the indiscretionate attack on all sides. JFK and his brothers were raised thinking they could do anything and get away with it . . . until you run into the bigger guy on the block. JFK ran into the bigger guy(s) on the block. We shouldn't concentrate on James Files or the like, but on the target. Kings don't get assassinated for nothing. They get assassinated for doing evil.
ThomZajac
Posts: 435
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: JAMES FILES TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS . . . ET AL

Post by ThomZajac »

Spoken like a true conspirator who no doubt thought they were doing the country good.Such arrogance!There are legal ways to address the improper use of power of which you allege. The true evil lives in thinking like yours.
Bob
Posts: 2652
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: JAMES FILES TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS . . . ET AL

Post by Bob »

JFK was evil? I can't wait to hear your opinion of Poppy and Dumbya Bu$h, two treasonous bastards of the highest kind. Let's examine JFK's resume. He stopped the Cuban Missile Crisis through negotiations, as opposed to launching an attack that the joint chiefs and CIA wanted that would have caused a nuclear exchange and WWIII. Before the Cuban Missile Crisis, JFK refused to implement Operation Northwoods, which all of the joint chiefs endorsed, as well as Allen Dulles. http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICL ... oods.htmlA similar plan to Operation Northwoods was carried out on 9/11/2001 when Dumbya Bu$h was President. Ironic huh? Ironic because his dad Poppy and grandfather Prescott both endorsed Operation Northwoods. Who is evil again? JFK was getting the U.S. out of Nam as well. Think about the 58,000 American lives that would have been saved, not to mention the countless hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese. JFK was also going to make big oil pay their fair share, plus was making radical changes to the Federal Reserve. JFK also established the Peace Corp. The legislation he was working on regarding medicare and civil rights was passed after his death. Look at the world now. Look at Wall Street and the $700 billion that was used to bail them out. Yet they still give themselves mountainous and obscene bonuses, yet won't lend to the common Joe on the street. Look at the power of the Fed. Look at oil prices over the past couple of years. Look at the profits made by big health insurance companies and big pharma, and the money they use to pay off politicians so they can keep their massive wealth. Look at where the wars are being fought. Near oil and oil pipelines. Look at the profits by the war profiteers like Blackwater, Halliburton and the like. Look at all that and then look at we the people. The people aren't doing too well overall. And it's getting worse. JFK saw what the future might bring. He tried to change that sordid future with his policies. He died for that vision. Evil? Sorry, wrong family. I think you mean the Bu$h family. Courageous maybe. An exceptional President to be sure. Did he have vices? Hell yes. But he was still an awesome leader. History has proven that. And so has the time we live in now.
andries
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: JAMES FILES TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS . . . ET AL

Post by andries »

If you were right Kennedy,s would still be allive,but their,e NOTSo i ques it must be horsedump.
ChristophMessner
Posts: 1056
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: JAMES FILES TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS . . . ET AL

Post by ChristophMessner »

JFKJF wrote:James Files is not a demented, twisted, lone nut serial killer. He is no different from any other present day operator taking care of business for his government, whether in uniform or out of uniform. At this moment, there are men trained and waiting the call to do the same that James Files was called to do. Nothing will ever change that. Colonel Marvin, amongst a myriad of others, was asked to do a similar task. The odds are that someone like a JFK would show up in the office of the presidency and make all the wrong moves. Most people only saw the public side of JFK and what the accepted press reported; young president, rich family, humorous, pretty wife, cute children, etc . . . In reality, we didn't see the behind the scenes life. There is a saying, if you saw what went on in a slaughterhouse, you would never eat meat again. JFK lacked discretion with a capital D. JFK was an adulterer. JFK also had hatred and murder in his heart for his adversaries, both foreign and domestic, and was hated likewise in return. Here we have two of them, JFK and RFK on the indiscretionate attack on all sides. JFK and his brothers were raised thinking they could do anything and get away with it . . . until you run into the bigger guy on the block. JFK ran into the bigger guy(s) on the block. We shouldn't concentrate on James Files or the like, but on the target. Kings don't get assassinated for nothing. They get assassinated for doing evil.It's true that in reality, we mostly don't see the behind of the scenes life. But partly we do by own experience and by interpolation and conclusion out of the results. JFK and his brothers were no holy men and they disobeyed the rules of the mafia. They had the courage to fight the plutocracy, the bloody way to make money, the secret "makers" behind the scenes, but they also behaved egomaniac and overrated themselves and made enemies by serious mistakes. Nevertheless on 11/22/63 not only an egomaniac was assassinated, but the office of the precidency of the US as such. Since Kennedy the office is filled with puppets and that is the bigger evilness here in the big game on the whole. Who is bringing the peak of the hidden pyramid of power to justice then?
tom jeffers
Posts: 442
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: JAMES FILES TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS . . . ET AL

Post by tom jeffers »

jfk's problem was the fact that he was a privileged rich kid. he was used to getting what he wanted with or without the help of others. his biggest mistake was that he did not play the game within the unofficial rulebook at that time, he stepped on some toes of a few boys that had a lot of power and they did not give a shit about the constitution of the us. somewhere up the line, there became a powerfull constiuent of people who believed in circumventing the constitution for their own personal game. they became too powerful, and jfk was the last president to step on their toes, period. jfk was not a saint, he played around a little, come on boys, if you got a shot of getting into marilyn's silk panties back then, how many of you would have said no? power is an aphrodisiac and it effects everyone that gets it. the question is how well they do what is right for the people, not by how many times he fell short on moral escapades. i want my president getting some tail, keeps him loose and in a good frame of mind. look at milliard filmore's ugly puss and ask yourself, was this man getting laid enough? hell no because nobody ever heard of milliard fillmore because he never did anything great because he never got laid.namaste'
Dealey Joe
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: JAMES FILES TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS . . . ET AL

Post by Dealey Joe »

tom jeffers wrote:jfk's problem was the fact that he was a privileged rich kid. he was used to getting what he wanted with or without the help of others. his biggest mistake was that he did not play the game within the unofficial rulebook at that time, he stepped on some toes of a few boys that had a lot of power and they did not give a shit about the constitution of the us. somewhere up the line, there became a powerfull constiuent of people who believed in circumventing the constitution for their own personal game. they became too powerful, and jfk was the last president to step on their toes, period. jfk was not a saint, he played around a little, come on boys, if you got a shot of getting into marilyn's silk panties back then, how many of you would have said no? power is an aphrodisiac and it effects everyone that gets it. the question is how well they do what is right for the people, not by how many times he fell short on moral escapades. i want my president getting some tail, keeps him loose and in a good frame of mind. look at milliard filmore's ugly puss and ask yourself, was this man getting laid enough? hell no because nobody ever heard of milliard fillmore because he never did anything great because he never got laid.namaste'I believe this has been my problem all along and now after you have explained it, I can see it.Do you think it is why I am so ugly?where do I go to Complain?
tom jeffers
Posts: 442
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: JAMES FILES TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS . . . ET AL

Post by tom jeffers »

joe,i think your a good lookin' man and you know beauty is in the eye of the beholder. (just pray you meet a lot of blind chicks.....LOL just kidding)
katisha
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: JAMES FILES TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS . . . ET AL

Post by katisha »

Nice response, Tom. (not the one about DJ - I'm staying right outta that )Just one other thing I noticed about the original post. Our friend starts his little gob of invective with this:"James Files is not a demented, twisted, lone nut serial killer."Now who, I ask myself, ever said James Files was a "demented, twisted, lone nut serial killer"? No-one that I know of. I've heard or seen LHO described in those terms many a time, though. Could it be a that this provocative little spiel was composed to post on JFK boards to stir things up; that it usually refers to LHO, but that our friend kindly customised it for our board? Methinks I sniff a troll.
tom jeffers
Posts: 442
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: JAMES FILES TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS . . . ET AL

Post by tom jeffers »

hmmm lets give him the benefit of doubt. he may have heard that said on another board.namaste'
Locked