JFK vs. The Federal Reserve:

[Bruce Patrick Brychek]

Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:JFK vs. The Federal Reserve, if you have not read and studied this, then you seriously should. This should be spread everywhere, if it is true, accurate, totally correct, and legal, as it appears to be.This should generate both, some answers to frequently asked questions, and more intense and intelligent questions as to who really runs the U.S. Economy and the Global Economy. Every time someone labels you a "Conspiracy Theorist," or a "Conspiracy Nut," make them read this.I would like Mr. Harvard Educated Lawyer, Mr. University of Chicago Law School Professor of Constitutional Law, Mr. President of The United States of America, Mr. President Barack Obama to explain why this law is not enforced, and when he will enforce it ? And why it hasn't been enforced heretofore ?I seriously doubt that they merely forgot about it. Bob, very strong subject matter for you and Black Ops Radio, and your other projects, don't you think ? I thought that you, Mr. Phil Dragoo, and other JFK Forum Members would have a real field day with this article, if you have not seen it yet.As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers who may not be as well versed as you.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.JFK Vs The Federal ReserveBy John P. Curran4-19-7On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, <executiveorder11110.htm>Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid. When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy - the author of Profiles in Courage -signed this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency -money - without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 [the full text is displayed further below] gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America. "United States Notes" were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. We compared a "Federal Reserve Note" issued from the private central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a "United States Note" from the U.S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy's Executive Order. They almost look alike, except one says "Federal Reserve Note" on the top while the other says "United States Note". Also, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number. President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper "currency" circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes. Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would have almost immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new "money". Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and realm value worth something. Again, according to our own research, just five months after Kennedy was assassinated, no more of the Series 1958 "Silver Certificates" were issued either, and they were subsequently removed from circulation. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to all future presidents not to interfere with the private Federal Reserve's control over the creation of money. It seems very apparent that President Kennedy challenged the "powers that exist behind U.S. and world finance". With true patriotic courage, JFK boldly faced the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt: 1) war (Viet Nam); and, 2) the creation of money by a privately owned central bank. His efforts to have all U.S. troops out of Vietnam by 1965 combined with Executive Order 11110 would have destroyed the profits and control of the private Federal Reserve Bank. Executive Order 11110 AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289 AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows: SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended - (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): "(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption," and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof. SECTION 2. The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made. JOHN F. KENNEDY THE WHITE HOUSE, June 4, 1963 Once again, Executive Order 11110 is still valid. According to Title 3, United States Code, Section 301 dated January 26, 1998: Executive Order (EO) 10289 dated Sept. 17, 1951, 16 F.R. 9499, was as amended by: EO 10583, dated December 18, 1954, 19 F.R. 8725; EO 10882 dated July 18, 1960, 25 F.R. 6869; EO 11110 dated June 4, 1963, 28 F.R. 5605; EO 11825 dated December 31, 1974, 40 F.R. 1003; EO 12608 dated September 9, 1987, 52 F.R. 34617 The 1974 and 1987 amendments, added after Kennedy's 1963 amendment, did not change or alter any part of Kennedy's EO 11110. A search of Clinton's 1998 and 1999 EO's and Presidential Directives has also shown no reference to any alterations, suspensions, or changes to EO 11110. The Federal Reserve Bank, a.k.a Federal Reserve System, is a Private Corporation. Black's Law Dictionary defines the "Federal Reserve System" as: "Network of twelve central banks to which most national banks belong and to which state chartered banks may belong. Membership rules require investment of stock and minimum reserves." Privately-owned banks own the stock of the FED. This was explained in more detail in the case of Lewis v. United States, Federal Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol. 680, Pages 1239, 1241 (1982), where the court said: "Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its region. The stock-holding commercial banks elect two thirds of each Bank's nine member board of directors". The Federal Reserve Banks are locally controlled by their member banks. Once again, according to Black's Law Dictionary, we find that these privately owned banks actually issue money: "Federal Reserve Act. Law which created Federal Reserve banks which act as agents in maintaining money reserves, issuing money in the form of bank notes, lending money to banks, and supervising banks. Administered by Federal Reserve Board (q.v.)". The privately owned Federal Reserve (FED) banks actually issue (create) the "money" we use. In 1964, the House Committee on Banking and Currency, Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, at the second session of the 88th Congress, put out a study entitled Money Facts which contains a good description of what the FED is: "The Federal Reserve is a total money-making machine. It can issue money or checks. And it never has a problem of making its checks good because it can obtain the $5 and $10 bills necessary to cover its check simply by asking the Treasury Department's Bureau of Engraving to print them". Any one person or any closely knit group who has a lot of money has a lot of power. Now imagine a group of people who have the power to create money. Imagine the power these people would have. This is exactly what the privately owned FED is! No man did more to expose the power of the FED than Louis T. McFadden, who was the Chairman of the House Banking Committee back in the 1930s. In describing the FED, he remarked in the Congressional Record, House pages 1295 and 1296 on June 10, 1932: "Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and he people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it". Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions, departments, or agencies. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers. Those 12 private credit monopolies were deceitfully placed upon this country by bankers who came here from Europe and who repaid us for our hospitality by undermining our American institutions. The FED basically works like this: The government granted its power to create money to the FED banks. They create money, then loan it back to the government charging interest. The government levies income taxes to pay the interest on the debt. On this point, it's interesting to note that the Federal Reserve Act and the sixteenth amendment, which gave congress the power to collect income taxes, were both passed in 1913. The incredible power of the FED over the economy is universally admitted. Some people, especially in the banking and academic communities, even support it. On the other hand, there are those, such as President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, that have spoken out against it. His efforts were spoken about in Jim Marrs' 1990 book Crossfire:" Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy's attempt to reform American society involves money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning to the constitution, which states that only Congress shall coin and regulate money, the soaring national debt could be reduced by not paying interest to the bankers of the Federal Reserve System, who print paper money then loan it to the government at interest. He moved in this area on June 4, 1963, by signing Executive Order 11110 which called for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes through the U.S. Treasury rather than the traditional Federal Reserve System. That same day, Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of one and two dollar bills from silver to gold, adding strength to the weakened U.S. currency. Kennedy's comptroller of the currency, James J. Saxon, had been at odds with the powerful Federal Reserve Board for some time, encouraging broader investment and lending powers for banks that were not part of the Federal Reserve system. Saxon also had decided that non-Reserve banks could underwrite state and local general obligation bonds, again weakening the dominant Federal Reserve banks". In a comment made to a Columbia University class on Nov. 12, 1963, Ten days before his assassination, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy allegedly said: "The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this plight." In this matter, John Fitzgerald Kennedy appears to be the subject of his own book... a true Profile of Courage. This research report was compiled for Lawgiver. Org. by Anthony Wayne What is the Federal Reserve Bank? What is the Federal Reserve Bank (FED) and why do we have it? by Greg Hobbs November 1, 1999 The FED is a central bank. Central banks are supposed to implement a country's fiscal policies. They monitor commercial banks to ensure that they maintain sufficient assets, like cash, so as to remain solvent and stable. Central banks also do business, such as currency exchanges and gold transactions, with other central banks. In theory, a central bank should be good for a country, and they might be if it wasn't for the fact that they are not owned or controlled by the government of the country they are serving. Private central banks, including our FED, operate not in the interest of the public good but for profit. There have been three central banks in our nation's history. The first two, while deceptive and fraudulent, pale in comparison to the scope and size of the fraud being perpetrated by our current FED. What they all have in common is an insidious practice known as "fractional banking." Fractional banking or fractional lending is the ability to create money from nothing, lend it to the government or someone else and charge interest to boot. The practice evolved before banks existed. Goldsmiths rented out space in their vaults to individuals and merchants for storage of their gold or silver. The goldsmiths gave these "depositors" a certificate that showed the amount of gold stored. These certificates were then used to conduct business. In time the goldsmiths noticed that the gold in their vaults was rarely withdrawn. Small amounts would move in and out but the large majority never moved. Sensing a profit opportunity, the goldsmiths issued double receipts for the gold, in effect creating money (certificates) from nothing and then lending those certificates (creating debt) to depositors and charging them interest as well. Since the certificates represented more gold than actually existed, the certificates were "fractionally" backed by gold. Eventually some of these vault operations were transformed into banks and the practice of fractional banking continued. Keep that fractional banking concept in mind as we examine our first central bank, the First Bank of the United States (BUS). It was created, after bitter dissent in the Congress, in 1791 and chartered for 20 years. A scam not unlike the current FED, the BUS used its control of the currency to defraud the public and establish a legal form of usury. This bank practiced fractional lending at a 10:1 rate, ten dollars of loans for each dollar they had on deposit. This misuse and abuse of their public charter continued for the entire 20 years of their existence. Public outrage over these abuses was such that the charter was not renewed and the bank ceased to exist in 1811. The war of 1812 left the country in economic chaos, seen by bankers as another opportunity for easy profits. They influenced Congress to charter the second central bank, the Second Bank of the United States (SBUS), in 1816. The SBUS was more expansive than the BUS. The SBUS sold franchises and literally doubled the number of banks in a short period of time. The country began to boom and move westward, which required money. Using fractional lending at the 10:1 rate, the central bank and their franchisees created the debt/money for the expansion. Things boomed for a while, then the banks decided to shut off the debt/money, citing the need to control inflation. This action on the part of the SBUS caused bankruptcies and foreclosures. The banks then took control of the assets that were used as security against the loans. Closely examine how the SBUS engineered this cycle of prosperity and depression. The central bank caused inflation by creating debt/money for loans and credit and making these funds readily available. The economy boomed. Then they used the inflation which they created as an excuse to shut off the loans/credit/money. The resulting shortage of cash caused the economy to falter or slow dramatically and large numbers of business and personal bankruptcies resulted. The central bank then seized the assets used as security for the loans. The wealth created by the borrowers during the boom was then transferred to the central bank during the bust. And you always wondered how the big guys ended up with all the marbles. Now, who do you think is responsible for all of the ups and downs in our economy over the last 85 years? Think about the depression of the late '20s and all through the '30s. The FED could have pumped lots of debt/money into the market to stimulate the economy and get the country back on track, but did they? No; in fact, they restricted the money supply quite severely. We all know the results that occurred from that action, don't we? Why would the FED do this? During that period asset values and stocks were at rock bottom prices. Who do you think was buying everything at 10 cents on the dollar? I believe that it is referred to as consolidating the wealth. How many times have they already done this in the last 85 years? Do you think they will do it again? Just as an aside at this point, look at today's economy. Markets are declining. Why? Because the FED has been very liberal with its debt/credit/money. The market was hyper inflated. Who creates inflation? The FED. How does the FED deal with inflation? They restrict the debt/credit/money. What happens when they do that? The market collapses. Several months back, after certain central banks said they would be selling large quantities of gold, the price of gold fell to a 25-year low of about $260 per ounce. The central banks then bought gold. After buying at the bottom, a group of 15 central banks announced that they would be restricting the amount of gold released into the market for the next five years. The price of gold went up $75.00 per ounce in just a few days. How many hundreds of billions of dollars did the central banks make with those two press releases? Gold is generally considered to be a hedge against more severe economic conditions. Do you think that the private banking families that own the FED are buying or selling equities at this time? (Remember: buy low, sell high.) How much money do you think these FED owners have made since they restricted the money supply at the top of this last current cycle? Alan Greenspan has said publicly on several occasions that he thinks the market is overvalued, or words to that effect. Just a hint that he will raise interest rates (restrict the money supply), and equity markets have a negative reaction. Governments and politicians do not rule central banks, central banks rule governments and politicians. President Andrew Jackson won the presidency in 1828 with the promise to end the national debt and eliminate the SBUS. During his second term President Jackson withdrew all government funds from the bank and on January 8, 1835, paid off the national debt. He is the only president in history to have this distinction. The charter of the SBUS expired in 1836. Without a central bank to manipulate the supply of money, the United States experienced unprecedented growth for 60 or 70 years, and the resulting wealth was too much for bankers to endure. They had to get back into the game. So, in 1910 Senator Nelson Aldrich, then Chairman of the National Monetary Commission, in collusion with representatives of the European central banks, devised a plan to pressure and deceive Congress into enacting legislation that would covertly establish a private central bank. This bank would assume control over the American economy by controlling the issuance of its money. After a huge public relations campaign, engineered by the foreign central banks, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was slipped through Congress during the Christmas recess, with many members of the Congress absent. President Woodrow Wilson, pressured by his political and financial backers, signed it on December 23, 1913. The act created the Federal Reserve System, a name carefully selected and designed to deceive. "Federal" would lead one to believe that this is a government organization. "Reserve" would lead one to believe that the currency is being backed by gold and silver. "System" was used in lieu of the word "bank" so that one would not conclude that a new central bank had been created. In reality, the act created a private, for profit, central banking corporation owned by a cartel of private banks. Who owns the FED? The Rothschilds of London and Berlin; Lazard Brothers of Paris; Israel Moses Seif of Italy; Kuhn, Loeb and Warburg of Germany; and the Lehman Brothers, Goldman, Sachs and the Rockefeller families of New York. Did you know that the FED is the only for-profit corporation in America that is exempt from both federal and state taxes? The FED takes in about one trillion dollars per year tax free! The banking families listed above get all that money. Almost everyone thinks that the money they pay in taxes goes to the US Treasury to pay for the expenses of the government. Do you want to know where your tax dollars really go? If you look at the back of any check made payable to the IRS you will see that it has been endorsed as "Pay Any F.R.B. Branch or Gen. Depository for Credit U.S. Treas. This is in Payment of U.S. Oblig." Yes, that's right, every dime you pay in income taxes is given to those private banking families, commonly known as the FED, tax free. Like many of you, I had some difficulty with the concept of creating money from nothing. You may have heard the term "monetizing the debt," which is kind of the same thing. As an example, if the US Government wants to borrow $1 million ó the government does borrow every dollar it spends ó they go to the FED to borrow the money. The FED calls the Treasury and says print 10,000 Federal Reserve Notes (FRN) in units of one hundred dollars. The Treasury charges the FED 2.3 cents for each note, for a total of $230 for the 10,000 FRNs. The FED then lends the $1 million to the government at face value plus interest. To add insult to injury, the government has to create a bond for $1 million as security for the loan. And the rich get richer. The above was just an example, because in reality the FED does not even print the money; it's just a computer entry in their accounting system. To put this on a more personal level, let's use another example. Today's banks are members of the Federal Reserve Banking System. This membership makes it legal for them to create money from nothing and lend it to you. Today's banks, like the goldsmiths of old, realize that only a small fraction of the money deposited in their banks is ever actually withdrawn in the form of cash. Only about 4 percent of all the money that exists is in the form of currency. The rest of it is simply a computer entry. Let's say you're approved to borrow $10,000 to do some home improvements. You know that the bank didn't actually take $10,000 from its pile of cash and put it into your pile? They simply went to their computer and input an entry of $10,000 into your account. They created, from thin air, a debt which you have to secure with an asset and repay with interest. The bank is allowed to create and lend as much debt as they want as long as they do not exceed the 10:1 ratio imposed by the FED. It sort of puts a new slant on how you view your friendly bank, doesn't it? How about those loan committees that scrutinize you with a microscope before approving the loan they created from thin air. What a hoot! They make it complex for a reason. They don't want you to understand what they are doing. People fear what they do not understand. You are easier to delude and control when you are ignorant and afraid. Now to put the frosting on this cake. When was the income tax created? If you guessed 1913, the same year that the FED was created, you get a gold star. Coincidence? What are the odds? If you are going to use the FED to create debt, who is going to repay that debt? The income tax was created to complete the illusion that real money had been lent and therefore real money had to be repaid. And you thought Houdini was good. So, what can be done? My father taught me that you should always stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand up alone. If "We the People" don't take some action now, there may come a time when "We the People" are no more. You should write a letter or send an email to each of your elected representatives. Many of our elected representatives do not understand the FED. Once informed they will not be able to plead ignorance and remain silent. Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution specifically says that Congress is the only body that can "coin money and regulate the value thereof." The US Constitution has never been amended to allow anyone other than Congress to coin and regulate currency. Ask your representative, in light of that information, how it is possible for the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and the Federal Reserve Bank that it created, to be constitutional. Ask them why this private banking cartel is allowed to reap trillions of dollars in profits without paying taxes. Insist on an answer. Thomas Jefferson said, "If the America people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currencies, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their prosperity until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." Jefferson saw it coming 150 years ago. The question is, "Can you now see what is in store for us if we allow the FED to continue controlling our country?" "The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he breaks, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt." John P. Curran Source: http://www.roc-grp.org/jfk.htmlDisclaimerEmail This Article MainPagehttp://www.rense.comThis Site Served by TheHostPros

[Bob]

Excellent topic Bruce. I've posted that before as well. It certainly tells quite a story. Also, as Congress tries to regulate Wall Street with their new bill, it still allows the Fed to be the fox in charge of the hen house. JFK saw the future of the Fed and Wall Street with the changes he tried to make. Look at the hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars the bastards have extorted from the American people over the last couple of years.I once posted a list as to why JFK was assassinated. Here it is...1) Changes to Federal Reserve he tried to implement2) De-escalating the Vietnam conflict and stopping big war profiteering3) Attempting to make drastic changes to the structure of the CIA and the powers that they had4) Making big oil pay their fair share5) Having RFK go after the mob with vengeance6) Trying to create a peaceful existance for the entire worldThat is why he died. Now look at the world today and look at the list above. Today there is substantially more power and profit in all of those situations today, except for maybe the mob. JFK saw the future and tried to change it. They killed him for it. The names have changed, but those who killed JFK are still in power. Looking back on the list now, I would flip flop reasons two and three. But I would still keep the changes JFK was making to the Federal Reserve at the top. Again...look at the world today. Look at the power of the Fed. Look at Wall Street. Look at the never ending wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the influence the CIA had in making them happen. Look at the war profiteering. Think of Halliburton (also involved in the BP oil spill in the Gulf) and Blackwater. Look at big oil and the massive profits they make and look at the excruciating environmental mess BP just caused in the Gulf, while Obama just looks away.Still, it all comes down to power and money. That is why the Federal Reserve is on the top of my list. The power elite still runs this world. Just ask the Bilderbergers.

[Dealey Joe]

Thanks for posting this Bruce. This is a subject close to my heart.You know there are 465+- people in the US that are directly responsible for upholding and defending the Constitution Of The United States. These people are elected by you and me to protect our interests on the national level.The Constitution is a precise and accurate document that Spells out and Limits the powers of the separate Branches of Government.A lot of things happened in the early 1900's. as you say the Federal Reserve System was put into place.The GRADUATED VOLUNTARy INCOME TAX was initiated at a flat 3% One of the least known but most important was the change to allow for the direct election of the U.S. Senate.What this done in effect was to destroy any and all input from the State Legislatures to the U.S. Congress.Senators were originally sent by the state legislatures to vote on things of interest to the state.It was another method of the check and balance built into our governmental system.Article 1 sec. 8 gives congress the power to Coin money and regulate the value thereof.Art.1 Sec10 Nothing but Gold and Silver Coin may be use to tender payment of debt.Article 6 Anything changing the original meaning and intent of this constitution is NOTWITHSTANDING12th Amendment is very interesting and direct how the President and V.P. are elected..everyone should read this:Amendment 12 - Choosing the President, Vice-President. Ratified 6/15/1804. Note History The Electoral CollegeThe Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;The person having the greatest Number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President.The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

[Phil Dragoo]

Bruce, Bob, JoeCraig Roberts in Kill Zone: A Sniper Looks at Dealey Plaza devotes much of his book—after Hathcock and sniper teams—to Kennedy's removal as threatening the Federal Reserve.Jekyll Island and J.P. Morgan and the Rothschild representative. The use of Teddy Roosevelt to exclude Taft, enabling the election of Wilson who signed—rather than veto as would have done Taft. But Wilson had regrets:“Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”John T. Flynn, The Roosevelt Myth, the fifty-year anniversary edition in 1998 with a foreword by Ralph Raico my history prof. Hoover tried to right the capsizing vessel. Roosevelt cheerfully applied an alphabet of new agencies and an ocean of currency created out of his cigarette smoke. His advisers claimed British economist John Maynard Keynes allowed for such, but Keynes anxiously wrote Roosevelt that he had grossly overspent in the public sector. When June, 1963 brought Executive Order 11110 with its shot across the bow of the Fed, the man who first pushed LBJ for president and then served him as financial adviser, Eliot Janeway, made the rounds of the financial houses.Our friend reported to Johnson biographer Robert Caro in 1998 that Janeway had visited our friend's financial house in Boston summer of 1963 to deliver a prepared warning of what a dangerous man this Kennedy was. It was delivered in a hiss, and Janeway was on to the rest of the Boston houses. Ironically, Janeway was born in 1913.Edith Kermit Roosevelt, granddaughter of President Theodore Roosevelt:“The word 'Establishment' is a general term for the power elite in international finance, business, the professions and government, largely from the northeast, who wield most of the power regardless of who is in the White House. Most people are unaware of the existence of this 'legitimate Mafia.' Yet the power of the Establishment makes itself felt from the professor who seeks a foundation grant, to the candidate for a cabinet post or State Department job. It affects the nation's policies in almost every area.”The Council on Foreign Relations was founded in 1921. Round Table Group formed London 1891 by Cecil Rhodes, Lord Rothschild et al. Infuse J.P. Morgan and others and voila Royal Institute of International Affairs (UK) and Council on Foreign Relations (US).I continually point to the 2004 CFR paper by Zbigniew Brzezinski and Robert Gates “Iran: Time for a New Direction” calling for negotiations with the Islamic Republic of Iran. And that's the game plan for Obama—Brzezinski who served Carter, and Gates who served Bush, are CFR, and Obama is all over trying to negotiate with Iran.Rothschild in 1773 called for international government. GHWBush called for The New World Order. Strobe Talbott Deputy Secretary of State under Clinton, Khruschev specialist, predicted the end of sovereignty. One wonders why such a bright and shining goal is not pursued in Beijing and Moscow. Perhaps the bankers will have the last laugh, funding all the arms races, owning all the players.But one must wonder about the Saudis who paid for Obama's Harvard, who provided Hillary her body person, their agent of influence Huma Abedin. Where did they get the money. From Kim Philby's father. Is there a plane at which religion, sovereignty, loyalty and strategy are reduced to the banking system.Is it all in the Casino Royale and did agent Kennedy, John Kennedy, get terminated with extreme prejudice before he could set the charges.Is he in the council of freedom with William Wallace and Thomas Jefferson feeding us clues?Recall Kennedy referred to the council he called during the missile crisis the greatest assemblage of minds with the possible exception of when Jefferson dined alone.Soros and the Saudi Prince set Obama on the stage, but not to act—merely to jump to their strings. In this game of musical chairs it must be recalled that—though Obama offered help to Greece, he himself is out on the edge of the ice. Europe was so shaky, Poland might have left Oceania—but Putin of Eurasia nipped that in the bud. While the four banks of Eastasia are based on bad real estate loans—so much corruption.Instability: China sends troops to border with Burma/Myanmar. Kim of Nork glows radioactive, arms Iran and Hezbollah and Hamas—with missiles. While Iran spins tens of thousands of centrifuges and China points thousands of missiles at Taiwan.Kennedy was the last man standing in his day. I can see my Latin teacher telling us how Caesar saw a soldier down and picked up his sword to fill the line.

[Bob]

Excellent analysis folks. As I've said many times, this is a subject that doesn't get near enough acclaim for why JFK was assassinated. Yes...there were other reasons as well, but this one tops this list...at least in my humble opinion.

[Dealey Joe]

There seems to be several parallels between JFK and A. Lincoln.Abe was messing with the money too, printing a new currency, changing things up a bit.Does anyone know exactly what Lincoln was doing and how it compares to Kennedy

[Bob]

Stan wrote:The decision to kill JFK came from the apex of power in the American political system. That power knew the decision could not fail, would not fail. Why? Because of their singular ownership of everything. It wags a very long and powerful tail. This system owns the U.S. military and all of it's intell organizations. Once the paradigm of singular ownership is established, I think the assassination begins to make some sense as does other world events such as 9-11.At the heart of this ownership is the Federal Reserve. Who owns it and what is it's function in the American system? If I'm not mistaken the primary ownership of this bank has been in place since the early 30s by a prominent family. Were they at odds with Kennedy throughout his presidency? Did they have men on the "inside," including his cabinet? Did they have motive for wanting his death? Did they benefit from his murder?I used to get caught in the labyrinth when studying this case: CIA, Cuba, LBJ, Hoover, anti-Castro Cubans, Texas Oil, the Mob. All of this is falls under a single umbrella of power. They are the wagged tail, and the tail did not make the decision to murder JFK. At least I now don't think they did. That decision came from a power base above all that. Helms, Dulles, Angleton, Phillips, McNamara, Rusk, the Bundy brothers were not rogue agents working against the system. The were the primary soldiers working on the inside FOR the system. They knew who true owners of the country were/are, who their bosses really were.Kennedy was changing everything, giving back the ownership of the country to the people it was supposed to belong to. For one brief shining moment he stood toe to toe with The Beast. And they killed him for it.Excellent take Stan. I certainly agree.For more on the history of the Federal Reserve and more great information concerning it, please see this...http://www.wtv-zone.com/Mary/BIGGESTSCAMINHISTORY.HTML

[R Croxford]

Dealey Joe wrote:There seems to be several parallels between JFK and A. Lincoln.Abe was messing with the money too, printing a new currency, changing things up a bit.Does anyone know exactly what Lincoln was doing and how it compares to KennedyLook at my post under the new world order. It explains it all. http://jfkmurdersolved.com/phpBB3/viewt ... p25350Goto year 1861

[Bob]

R Croxford wrote:Dealey Joe wrote:There seems to be several parallels between JFK and A. Lincoln.Abe was messing with the money too, printing a new currency, changing things up a bit.Does anyone know exactly what Lincoln was doing and how it compares to KennedyLook at my post under the new world order. It explains it all. http://jfkmurdersolved.com/phpBB3/viewt ... p25350Goto year 1861Here it is for all to see...1861: President Abraham Lincoln (16th President of the United States from 1860 till his assassination in 1865) approaches the big banks in New York to try to obtain loans to support the ongoing American civil war. As these large banks were heavily under the influence of the Rothschilds, they offer him a deal they know he cannot accept, 24% to 36% interest on all monies loaned.Lincoln is very angry about this high level of interest and so he prints his own debt free money and informs the public that this is now legal tender for both public and private debts.1862: By April $449,338,902 worth of Lincoln’s debt free money has been printed and distributed. He states of this,“We gave the people of this republic the greatest blessing they ever had, their own paper money to pay their own debts.”That same year The Times of London publishes a story containing the following statement,"If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce.It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe."1863: President Abraham Lincoln discovers the Tsar of Russia, Alexander II (1855 – 1881), was having problems with the Rothschilds as well as he was refusing their continual attempts to set up a central bank in Russia. The Tsar then gives President Lincoln some unexpected help.The Tsar issued orders that if either England or France actively intervened in the American Civil War, and help the South, Russia would consider such action a declaration of war, and take the side of President Lincoln. To show that he wasn't messing about, he sent part of his Pacific Fleet to port in San Francisco and another part to New York.Tsar and Lincoln have a common enemy.The Rothschild banking house in Naples, Italy, C. M. de Rothschild e figli, closes following the unification of Italy. The Rothschilds use one of their own in America, John D. Rockefeller, to form an oil business called Standard Oil which eventually takes over all of its competition.1864: Rothschild, August Belmont, who by now is the Democratic Party's National Chairman, supports General George McClellan as the Democratic nominee to run against President Abraham Lincoln in this year's election. Much to the anger of Belmont, President Lincoln wins the election.1865: In a statement to Congress, President Abraham Lincoln states,"I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me, and the financial institutions in the rear. Of the two, the one in my rear is my greatest foe."Later that year, on April 14, President Lincoln is assassinated, less than two months before the end of the American Civil War.Following a brief training period in the Rothschilds London Bank, Jacob Schiff, a Rothschild, born in their house in Frankfurt, arrives in America at the age of 18, with instructions and the finance necessary to buy into a banking house there. The purpose of this was to carry out the following tasks.1. Gain control of America's money system through the establishment of a central bank. 2. Find desirable men, who for a price, would be willing to serve as stooges for the Illuminati and promote them into high places in the federal government, the Congress, Supreme Court, and all the federal agencies. 3. Create minority group strife throughout the nations, particularly targeting the whites and blacks. 4. Create a movement to destroy religion in the United States, with Christianity as the main target.Nathaniel de Rothschild becomes Member of Parliament for Aylesbury in Buckinghamshire.

[Michael Calder]

Bruce, Bob, R Croxford, et, alI didn't know. I'm sitting here stunned. Time for war! www.jfkcia.com