Page 1 of 2

Realize the significance of this?

Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 6:43 pm
by dankbaar
The significance cannot be overstated:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQ8NJwq58Fg

Re: Realize the significance of this?

Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 9:44 pm
by bob franklin
This completly destroys the sbt. What are they gonna say now? "The bullet then exited the Governor's thigh, opened a temporal rift, & flew back through time to deposit itself on the (wrong) stretcher. Some magic bullet, that 399! One thing: the doc said left thigh. Which thigh was he hit in? I always thought it was the right.

Re: Realize the significance of this?

Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 9:54 pm
by kenmurray
McAdams and "Mr.Chicken" Von Pein will say the doc is "mistaken". These 2 clowns always talks about "factoids". A factoid to them is a KNOWN FACT they don't believe in.

Re: Realize the significance of this?

Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 11:53 pm
by Dealey Joe
That is confusing, that 399 must have really went wild..It had to be a magic bullet.This opens a new door, where dig they dig this one up?

Re: Realize the significance of this?

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 4:55 am
by Deborah
dankbaar wrote:The significance cannot be overstated:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQ8NJwq58FgI do realize the significance and saw this video some time ago. The question in my mind instantly was, 'where is the bullet that was to be removed from Connolly at a later date'? Top down, bottom up, middle conformist government coup d'etat cover up all the way. Why should this not surprise us?

Magic

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:13 am
by Phil Dragoo

Re: Realize the significance of this?

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 4:22 pm
by Dealey Joe
Who's on Third?I think through all the B.S. we can deduce that Connally had a bullet in his left leg.

Trajectory Of A Lie

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 4:47 pm
by kenmurray
One example of manufactured evidence is the lie about Connally’s back wound. Why do supporters of the SBT say the wound was 3 centimeters long, when, in fact, it was only half as long? Why was the 1.5 centimeter wound a problem? Defenders of the theory say that if the Carcano bullet had struck sideways (as opposed to nose-on), it would have created a wound the same size as its length (3 centimeters), and such a long wound would be proof the bullet had been tumbling. If it had been tumbling, this, presumably, would be proof it had struck something else on its way to Connally’s back. The something else in this case: John F. Kennedy.Problem: Connally’s back wound was only as long as the wound in the back of Kennedy’s head: 1.5 centimeters. No one has suggested Kennedy was hit in the head with a tumbling bullet.

Besmirching History

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 2:52 am
by kenmurray

The Connally Bullet

Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:50 pm
by kenmurray