9.11.2001

[Dealey Joe]

The September 11 attacks (also referred to as September 11, September 11th or 9/11 were a series of four coordinated suicide attacks upon the United States in New York City and the Washington, D.C., area on September 11, 2001. On that Tuesday morning, 19 terrorists from the Islamist militant group al-Qaeda hijacked four passenger jets. The hijackers intentionally crashed two planes, American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175, into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City; both towers collapsed within two hours. Hijackers crashed American Airlines Flight 77 into the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia. The fourth jet, United Airlines Flight 93, crashed into a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, after passengers attempted to take control before it could reach the hijacker's intended target in Washington, D.C. Nearly 3,000 died in the attacks.Suspicion quickly fell on al-Qaeda, and in 2004, the group's leader Osama bin Laden, who had initially denied involvement, claimed responsibility for the attacks. Al-Qaeda and bin Laden cited U.S. support of Israel, the presence of U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia, and sanctions against Iraq as motives for the attacks. The United States responded to the attacks by launching the War on Terror, invading Afghanistan to depose the Taliban, which had harbored al-Qaeda members. Many countries strengthened their anti-terrorism legislation and expanded law enforcement powers. In May 2011, after years at large, bin Laden was found and killed.The destruction caused serious damage to the economy of Lower Manhattan and had a significant impact on global markets. Cleanup of the World Trade Center site was completed in May 2002, and the Pentagon was repaired within a year. Numerous memorials were constructed, including the National September 11 Memorial & Museum in New York, the Pentagon Memorial, and the Flight 93 National Memorial. Adjacent to the National Memorial, the 1,776 feet (541 m) One World Trade Center is estimated for completion in 2013Early on the morning of September 11, 2001, 19 hijackers took control of four commercial airliners en route to San Francisco or Los Angeles after takeoffs from Boston, Massachusettes, Newark, New Jersey, and Washington, D.C.[3] Planes with long flights were intentionally selected for hijacking because they would be heavily fueled.The four flights involved were:American Airlines Flight 11: Left Boston’s Logan Airport at 7:59 a.m. enroute to Los Angeles with a crew of 11 and 76 passengers, not including five hijackers. The hijackers flew the plane into the North Tower of the World Trade Center at 8:46 a.m.United Airlines Flight 175: Left Logan Airport at 8:14 a.m. enroute to Los Angeles with a crew of nine and 51 passengers, not including five hijackers. The hijackers flew the plane into the South Tower of the World Trade Center at 9:03 a.m.American Airlines Flight 77: Left Washington Dulles International Airport in Northern Virginia at 8:20 a.m. enroute to Los Angeles with a crew of six and 53 passengers, not including five hijackers. The hijackers flew the plane into the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m.United Airlines Flight 93: Left Newark International Airport at 8:42 a.m. enroute to San Francisco, with a crew of seven and 33 passengers, not including four hijackers. After the passengers revolted the hijackers crashed the plane into the ground near Shanksville, Pennsylvania at 10:03 a.m.Media coverage was intense during the attacks and aftermath, beginning moments after the first crash into the World Trade Center

[Dealey Joe]

THE NEW PEARL HARBOR:by Bruce Patrick Brychek » Fri Mar 24, 2006 1:58 pm The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About The Bush Administration And 09.11.2001, by David Ray Griffin, with a foreward by Richard Falk, 2004 by Olive Branch Press, an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc., 46 Crosby Street, Northampton, Massachusetts, 01060. Nick Whalen, Tim Carroll, Bob, Billy Boggs, since I respect the Writing Styles and Research and Investigation Levels that you all function at, I would really invite your feedback on this book when you have time. This book is powerful, well researched, well written, and well documented for being published so quickly after 09.11.2001. "The most persuasive argument I have seen for further investigation of the Bush administrations' relationship to that historic and troubling event." Howard Zinn, author of A People's History of the United States. "This is a very important book. David Ray Griffin's carefully researched and documented study demonstrates a high level of probability that the Bush administration was complicit in allowing 9/11 to happen in order to further war plans that had already been made. A must-read for anyone concerned about American foreign policy under the present administration." Rosemary Radford Clifford Carpenter Professor of Feminist Theology Graduate Theological Union Berkeley, California Respectfully, Bruce Patrick Brychek.

[Dealey Joe]

THE NEW PEARL HARBOR:by Bruce Patrick Brychek » Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:13 pm Dear Mr. Wim Dankbaar, and Fellow JFK Forum Members, Now that Iraq is officially a Civil War, everything is out of control, Rumsfeld has "resigned," War Charges have been filed against Rumsfeld, 30 % of Americans or more believe that 09.11.2001 had US Government involvement, we may be asking Iran and Syria for help in Iraq, Why we went to war with Iraq after 09.11.2001 needs to be re-visited strongly by the American people now, more than ever. If anyone has read this book, I would appreciate your thoughts. Respectfuly, Bruce Patrick Brychek.

[Dealey Joe]

THE NEW PEARL HARBOR:by kenmurray » Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:17 pm 9/11 Coincidences:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3JmXQ-z ... v=NHJHAp49 ... re=relatedkenmurray Posts: 2913Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 3:55 pmPrivate messageE-mail kenmurray

[Dealey Joe]

Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11by Pasquale DiFabrizio » Mon Nov 15, 2010 1:03 pm Gentlemen,I know you will find this very interesting and disturbing. I don't think this has been posted yet, but it's important because it's very strong evidence of media PARTICIPATION (not just complicity) in the 9/11 event that put the U.S. into military conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is something that has been puzzling me for a while. The video clip below shows various news clips of the supposed second plane that hit the south tower of the World Trade Center, which was was the second tower to be hit. It appears that some video faking is going on. For example, the smoke coming from the first tower to be hit..., the north tower, was basically traveling over the south tower. It seems that different TV news channels showed the same plane hitting the same tower from different directions. I'm very serious here. I'll put the link below and tell you what to look for.The smoke from the North Tower, that had already been hit, is your point of reference. It is always traveling or flowing in the direction of the South Tower. The smoke is your point of reference. Here we go!For example, at 14 seconds into the video, we see a video shot from ABC showing a plane striking the south tower coming from the right. The smoke coming from the north tower is, of course, traveling over the south tower which is obstructed from view by the north tower. So from this camera angle, the smoke is going away from the camera. In stark contrast to what I wrote above, at 1:36 (1 min., 36 sec.) into the video, they show a different TV network showing the same event from a different camera angle. The smoke from the north tower is now going to the right (over the south tower as usual), and the plane that hits the south tower is again coming fro the right. Already there appears to be a problem with the angle of approach of the plane. Then, at 3:40 into the video, or 3 min., 40 sec. into the video, another network shows the same event, only this time the smoke is going to left (over the south tower like before, just from a different camera angle), and the plane that hits it is coming from the right! Take a look for yourselves.How can the plane that supposedly hit the south tower of the WTC be shown on different networks coming from different directions? It's starting to look like the plane is a computer graphic image that was superimposed onto the videos. Again, at about 5:50, or 5 min. and 50 sec. into the video, they show the Fox News footage of the second plane hitting the south tower. The camera angle is different again. The smoke is going over the south tower and traveling AWAY from the camera. In fact, the south tower is completely obscured by the north tower, and THE PLANE AGAIN COMES FROM THE RIGHT of the screen. WTF?When you look at the footage from the different networks, just remember that the smoke from the first tower to be hit is always traveling over the south tower of the WTC. Keep that in mind as a reference point, and you will quickly see what I mean. This may be evidence of some media hoaxing going on with regard to what really happened that day.Just remember, the smoke from the north tower is always going over and in the direction of the south tower. That is your reference point. You should quickly see what I mean. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lKZqqSI9-sThe link below is from a Fox News special called "9/11 As It Happened." At 2:42 in the video, or 2 min. and 42 sec. into the video, the camera angle shows the south tower totally obscured by the north tower and the smoke is traveling AWAY from the camera and over the obscured south tower. The plane, that appears black, comes from the right to hit the south tower.In contrast to this, at about 7:13 or 7 sec. and 13 sec. into the video they show what is supposed to be the same event but from a different camera angle. In this clip the smoke is traveling to the left and, as usual, in the direction of and over the south tower. In this clip, the plane is coming AT the camera and not even straight. It is descending while coming at the camera to hit the south tower. http://video.foxnews.com/v/4335916/911- ... appenedThe link below is from http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2009/09/11/ ... cks/Scroll down to the video clip called "Raw Video: The South Tower Is Hit (Sept. 11, 2001)"The camera angle shows the smoke going to the left and over the south tower, and the plane comes from the LEFT to hit the south tower. Then, right after that, they show the same "event" with the smoke going to the left and the plane coming from the RIGHT! http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2009/09/11/ ... ttacks/The meaning of this appears to be quite clear. The media was not only complicit in 9/11. It appears that they were a PART of what went on that day. It's one thing for the media to go to sleep AFTER a crime has been committed. It's quite another for the media to actively take PART in a murderous event.Last edited by Pasquale DiFabrizio on Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total. Pasquale DiFabrizio"Think with your dipstick, Jimmy!!!"

[kenmurray]

by kenmurray » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:09 pm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc

[kenmurray]

by kenmurray » Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:11 am 9/11: Flight 93 Shanksville Fly Over Indian Lake:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXTAgFYyvUE

[kenmurray]

by kenmurray » Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:05 pm The Flight 93 Fraud: No Wonder It was Only Aired Once.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpMYVJWsL-o

[kenmurray]

The 9/11 Commission Was A Criminal Coverupby kenmurray » Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:57 am http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OABI2Mv0RoA

[kenmurray]

FEMA In New York On Sept 10, 2001by kenmurray » Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:42 pm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLy_nmnE2FM