"Oswald" in Mexico - the focal point of coverup
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 7:21 pm
http://www.jfklancer.com/backes/newman/
All the old pros probably know it very well but might be interesting for the newbies. This is a time line reconstructed after the JFK act documentation release of the late 90s. Which basically shows how the "Oswald" his impersonator(s) link to KGB dept 13 (assassinations) has been carefully planted before and after November and in such places and circumstances within the government where only some US moles could have done it.
Also, it nicely documents how crucial were the first hours and days after the assassination when Johnson and Hoover used it to twist people like Warren and Russel and others to go with the "lone nutter theory" and coverup. The way how they applied the presure was that possible WWIII is at stake etc..
LBJ informs Russell he is on Commission :@ ) and mentions "Oswald" in Mexico thingy:
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/ ... 63_2nd.htm
Because the embarasment and perhaps also fear they could be next in the line stemming from the fact that some "rightwing" moles inflitrated all of the agencies in setting up "Oswald" as Russian-Cuban plot assassin the cover up commenced immediately. Also Oswald had file since 1959 which was another embarrasment..
That however, doesn't mean than Johnson wasn't somehow on the plot directly as well but that's another story and no hard evidence is available yet. For one thing, we know for sure he immediately reversed all the important JFK policies so he just went along because of combination of fear (got the message), and perhaps different personal opinion on these policies anyway etc..
The author John Newman has done some good and important 9/11 research too recently.. Google his 9/11 Comm review panel testimony, it has been just released by the rep. McKinney office it's like 300pages.
Pretty good stuff the entire report, basically 'inside job' proven beyond reasonable doubt at least from the LIHOP perspective. I'm personaly leaning towards something between LIHOP and MIHOP, Cheney was in charge of the NORAD stand down, and some other people on the board used the opportunity to knock down the WTC7 bldg later the same day with all that Wallstreet dirt laundery of the stock market frauds of late 90s which have been investigated etc..
We have got nowadays something like 5 experts (PhD, demo experts) internationaly in blds statics and construction who claim the WTC7 was controlled demolition (CT) with the highest probability..
Sometimes I feel the more aggresive 9/11 truthers are just muddying the waters, because the LIHOP case is pretty strong, and by introducing controversial issues like CT of WTC1,2 and no plane at Pentagon.
On the other hand these "radicals" brought the most attention to the movement so I do not know I might be wrong about them..
Well, the LIHOP v. MIHOP is crap anyway, we know 15highjackers got visas from US Saudi consulate against the procedural code (CIA station) where mujahedins were served similarly in the late 80s. Uncle Cheney was in charge of air defense since summer till 9/11, war games were rescheduled to 9/11 and evidently crippled the US air defense system. So in any case we have got air tight case. Just to find a prosecutor.
At the minimum we can get them on negligence, perjury etc. since they apparently have been warned SPECIFICALLY about airplanes used as missiles before 9/11 and then lied about it. So at least Condi, Ari, Cheney, Bush are ready for jumpsuits..
All the old pros probably know it very well but might be interesting for the newbies. This is a time line reconstructed after the JFK act documentation release of the late 90s. Which basically shows how the "Oswald" his impersonator(s) link to KGB dept 13 (assassinations) has been carefully planted before and after November and in such places and circumstances within the government where only some US moles could have done it.
Also, it nicely documents how crucial were the first hours and days after the assassination when Johnson and Hoover used it to twist people like Warren and Russel and others to go with the "lone nutter theory" and coverup. The way how they applied the presure was that possible WWIII is at stake etc..
LBJ informs Russell he is on Commission :@ ) and mentions "Oswald" in Mexico thingy:
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/ ... 63_2nd.htm
Because the embarasment and perhaps also fear they could be next in the line stemming from the fact that some "rightwing" moles inflitrated all of the agencies in setting up "Oswald" as Russian-Cuban plot assassin the cover up commenced immediately. Also Oswald had file since 1959 which was another embarrasment..
That however, doesn't mean than Johnson wasn't somehow on the plot directly as well but that's another story and no hard evidence is available yet. For one thing, we know for sure he immediately reversed all the important JFK policies so he just went along because of combination of fear (got the message), and perhaps different personal opinion on these policies anyway etc..
The author John Newman has done some good and important 9/11 research too recently.. Google his 9/11 Comm review panel testimony, it has been just released by the rep. McKinney office it's like 300pages.
Pretty good stuff the entire report, basically 'inside job' proven beyond reasonable doubt at least from the LIHOP perspective. I'm personaly leaning towards something between LIHOP and MIHOP, Cheney was in charge of the NORAD stand down, and some other people on the board used the opportunity to knock down the WTC7 bldg later the same day with all that Wallstreet dirt laundery of the stock market frauds of late 90s which have been investigated etc..
We have got nowadays something like 5 experts (PhD, demo experts) internationaly in blds statics and construction who claim the WTC7 was controlled demolition (CT) with the highest probability..
Sometimes I feel the more aggresive 9/11 truthers are just muddying the waters, because the LIHOP case is pretty strong, and by introducing controversial issues like CT of WTC1,2 and no plane at Pentagon.
On the other hand these "radicals" brought the most attention to the movement so I do not know I might be wrong about them..
Well, the LIHOP v. MIHOP is crap anyway, we know 15highjackers got visas from US Saudi consulate against the procedural code (CIA station) where mujahedins were served similarly in the late 80s. Uncle Cheney was in charge of air defense since summer till 9/11, war games were rescheduled to 9/11 and evidently crippled the US air defense system. So in any case we have got air tight case. Just to find a prosecutor.
At the minimum we can get them on negligence, perjury etc. since they apparently have been warned SPECIFICALLY about airplanes used as missiles before 9/11 and then lied about it. So at least Condi, Ari, Cheney, Bush are ready for jumpsuits..