What are we waiting on? What is all of this accomplishing?
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:10 pm
We continue to discuss, but we are accomplishing little.
Why haven't we brought arrests against individuals who have committed crimes?
We haven't gotten Lee Harvey Oswald removed from historic records and documentation as the killer of JFK. History books still mention him as the "killer on record", with only a slight mention that it is believed that "conspiratorial forces MAY PERHAPS have been involved".
So we still stand where we stood on November 23, 1963. We've basically accomplished little, if anything. Oswald is "credited" with the shooting.
It baffles me as to why we haven't brought/initiated charges against individuals for purported crimes and the like.
Why didn't someone bring charges against the limo driver, who obviously broke procedure as the limo coasted down Elm Street. He was to protect the President that day -- OUR president!!! -- and his actions hindered that task. As a US citizen, I would have wanted to bring legal action against him for his negligence on that day.
Charges against the limo driver could have uncovered evidence that he was ORDERED to break procedure, which, in turn, could have opened a whole can of worms.
But no, he was allowed to go free, unscathed from the law. Now he is dead. Never can he reveal anything sinister and meaningful.
And what about Jack Ruby? Why didn't anyone -- Mark Lane, for example -- rush to his jail cell, and get the damn confession from him that would have revealed the masterminds of a conspriacy against JFK?
Ruby had the dope on these guys. He wanted to talk. He made that public.
So where were the proponents of a conspiracy? They never were seen near Ruby's jail cell. Ruby took visitors. All prisoners do. So why weren't invesigators lined up dozens deep in front of Ruby's cell?
Now he, too, is dead.
And what about all the Warren Commission members? They all were a party to circulating false information, much of which has been proven to be false, or, at least, could not stand its ground in a fair debate with an opposing view point.
So why weren't we bringing charges against those members? Ford, for example, was caught red-handed with his admission of altering evidence by moving the bullet hole in JFK's back up a few inches so as to advance the single bullet theory.
Why wasn't there litigation brought against Ford? This would have accomplihed much, the most of which would have been to show the public that there is now real evidence that the government was involved in acts that could be construde as conspiratorial, thereby lending support for all that we are trying to accomplish -- the removal from historical accounts of LHO as the lone shooter, that there were other shooters, and that conspiratorial forces were at work inside our government.
Instead, there remains a false historical account of the shooting and only a passing mention of a conspiracy at work, and, perhaps most disappointingly, there remains within the general public's minds a misunderstanding as to how the mechanics of such a conspiracy was to have worked against JFK.
The public, and mostly those considered conservative in the political arena, cannot comprehend the idea that elected US officials could be involved in anything so sinister as the execution of other US officials.
Why didn't Mark Lane, for example, begin litigation against Gerald Ford?
We sit around and talk about information we find, show video and film, and put 2 and 2 together.
Then we pat ourselves on the back, pleased that we discovered something new, and then we continue to another topic.
And then another topic. And still another topic.....
When do we ever put this information we have gathered to work for us?
When do we allowed it to accomplish something for us?
Why don't we ever put it to work?
We are letting opportunities pass us by.
The cast of characters are getting older by the day.
Our time is limited.
I am a meek and humble individual. I cannot start the mechanics of litigation and interrogation into motion. I don't have the pull nor the influence.
But some of you do.....You know who you are.
And if I were you, I'd start with George Bush senior. But you better get started. His time on earth is limited. He is rapidly aging.
What are you waiting for?
Oh, I see.....You've got topics to explore and to discuss. Then, you say, you'll then have a few more after that. I see.....
In the meantime, the cast of characters grow old and face death......
Opportunitites become lost.
What are you waiting on?
When are you going to put this knowledge that we have gathered to work?
"THE PEOPLE'S VS GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH, IN THE DEATH OF JOHN F KENNEDY"
Why - Why is this not being organized at this precise moment?
WHY ????!!!!!!!
Oh.... I forgot.....you have topics to explore and to discuss.....then you'll get back to me at a later date.....
I see........
Why haven't we brought arrests against individuals who have committed crimes?
We haven't gotten Lee Harvey Oswald removed from historic records and documentation as the killer of JFK. History books still mention him as the "killer on record", with only a slight mention that it is believed that "conspiratorial forces MAY PERHAPS have been involved".
So we still stand where we stood on November 23, 1963. We've basically accomplished little, if anything. Oswald is "credited" with the shooting.
It baffles me as to why we haven't brought/initiated charges against individuals for purported crimes and the like.
Why didn't someone bring charges against the limo driver, who obviously broke procedure as the limo coasted down Elm Street. He was to protect the President that day -- OUR president!!! -- and his actions hindered that task. As a US citizen, I would have wanted to bring legal action against him for his negligence on that day.
Charges against the limo driver could have uncovered evidence that he was ORDERED to break procedure, which, in turn, could have opened a whole can of worms.
But no, he was allowed to go free, unscathed from the law. Now he is dead. Never can he reveal anything sinister and meaningful.
And what about Jack Ruby? Why didn't anyone -- Mark Lane, for example -- rush to his jail cell, and get the damn confession from him that would have revealed the masterminds of a conspriacy against JFK?
Ruby had the dope on these guys. He wanted to talk. He made that public.
So where were the proponents of a conspiracy? They never were seen near Ruby's jail cell. Ruby took visitors. All prisoners do. So why weren't invesigators lined up dozens deep in front of Ruby's cell?
Now he, too, is dead.
And what about all the Warren Commission members? They all were a party to circulating false information, much of which has been proven to be false, or, at least, could not stand its ground in a fair debate with an opposing view point.
So why weren't we bringing charges against those members? Ford, for example, was caught red-handed with his admission of altering evidence by moving the bullet hole in JFK's back up a few inches so as to advance the single bullet theory.
Why wasn't there litigation brought against Ford? This would have accomplihed much, the most of which would have been to show the public that there is now real evidence that the government was involved in acts that could be construde as conspiratorial, thereby lending support for all that we are trying to accomplish -- the removal from historical accounts of LHO as the lone shooter, that there were other shooters, and that conspiratorial forces were at work inside our government.
Instead, there remains a false historical account of the shooting and only a passing mention of a conspiracy at work, and, perhaps most disappointingly, there remains within the general public's minds a misunderstanding as to how the mechanics of such a conspiracy was to have worked against JFK.
The public, and mostly those considered conservative in the political arena, cannot comprehend the idea that elected US officials could be involved in anything so sinister as the execution of other US officials.
Why didn't Mark Lane, for example, begin litigation against Gerald Ford?
We sit around and talk about information we find, show video and film, and put 2 and 2 together.
Then we pat ourselves on the back, pleased that we discovered something new, and then we continue to another topic.
And then another topic. And still another topic.....
When do we ever put this information we have gathered to work for us?
When do we allowed it to accomplish something for us?
Why don't we ever put it to work?
We are letting opportunities pass us by.
The cast of characters are getting older by the day.
Our time is limited.
I am a meek and humble individual. I cannot start the mechanics of litigation and interrogation into motion. I don't have the pull nor the influence.
But some of you do.....You know who you are.
And if I were you, I'd start with George Bush senior. But you better get started. His time on earth is limited. He is rapidly aging.
What are you waiting for?
Oh, I see.....You've got topics to explore and to discuss. Then, you say, you'll then have a few more after that. I see.....
In the meantime, the cast of characters grow old and face death......
Opportunitites become lost.
What are you waiting on?
When are you going to put this knowledge that we have gathered to work?
"THE PEOPLE'S VS GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH, IN THE DEATH OF JOHN F KENNEDY"
Why - Why is this not being organized at this precise moment?
WHY ????!!!!!!!
Oh.... I forgot.....you have topics to explore and to discuss.....then you'll get back to me at a later date.....
I see........