9 REASONS WHY TRUMP'S IMPEACHMENT IS A FRAUD:

Bruce Patrick Brychek · Thu Oct 03, 2019 4:06 am

Wednesday10.02.201911:06 p.m.,Chicago, Illinois time:Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:Attorney Michael Dorstewitz is a Retired Lawyer, and a Brilliant Legal Analyst and Writer.Read, Review, and Study the following if you are following The Main Stream Media's Lop Sided Reporting about President Donald J. Trump.A Major Reason WHY THE DEMOCRATIC-SOCIALISTS MUST DESTROY TRUM IS THAT THEY ARE CONVINCEDTHAT TRUMP WILL WIN EVEN MORE CONVINCINGLY IN 2020.As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers who may not be as well versed as you.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.Wednesday October 02, 2019Michael Dorstewitz9 Reasons Why Tumps' Impeachment Is a Fraud !U.S. President Donald Trump gives pauses to answer a reporters' question about a whistleblower as he leaves the Oval Office after hosting the ceremonial swearing in of Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia at the White House September 30, 2019, in Washington, D.C. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)By Michael Dorstewitz Tuesday, 01 October 2019 06:47 PMCurrent | Bio | Archive Last week’s announcement by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi authorizing an impeachment inquiry — the latest in a series of Democratic attempts to reverse the results of the 2016 presidential election — is replete with dishonesty and outright fraud.The attacks on President Trump began even before his Inauguration, when electors were asked to reject the will of the people of their states and to instead cast their ballots for Hillary Clinton.Vanity Fair reported as far back as December 2016: “Democrats are paving the way to impeach Donald Trump.”NewsBusters released a video montage depicting media figures discussing the possibility impeaching Trump as early as November 2016.But when the accusations of collusion and obstruction imploded, Trump’s mortal enemies needed something else. Finally, they settled on Ukraine-gate.Here are 9 reasons the entire effort is a fraud perpetrated upon the American people:No. 1: The president’s remarks did not violate any law. Democrats point to the transcript of Trump’s July 25 conversation with Ukraine’s newly elected president, Volodymyr Zelensky, as evidence of a crime. Specifically, they hone in on Trump’s words, “I would like you to do us a favor,” the favor being to assist the United States into investigating the activities of a Ukrainian company that had hired Hunter Biden — the son of former Vice President Joe Biden. They claim that this may be evidence of bribery or extortion, and point to Trump’s statement that “the United States has been very, very good to Ukraine” as incentive.But even given the most cynical interpretation possible, those statements do not come close to bribery or extortion.At a press briefing held at the United Nations last week, Zelensky said that “we spoke about many things and so I think — you read it — that nobody pushed me.”That’s why you now hear the president’s detractors saying the White House transcript was not a complete and verbatim account; that parts of the conversation may have been missing. But lack of evidence isn’t evidence of a high crime or misdemeanor.No. 2: A presidential request for assistance is not an abuse of power. The New York Times reported that “White House officials believed they had witnessed President Trump abuse his power for political gain.” Apart from reports that the “whistle-blower” report is based on second-hand and possibly even third-hand information, requesting assistance from Ukraine in this instance is not an abuse of power.Trump was, in fact, asking for Zelensky’s assistance on behalf of Attorney General William Barr — the chief law enforcement officer of the United States. Barr is engaged in ferreting out foreign influence on the 2016 election. That influence may include an Obama administration request that Ukraine investigate then-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort — for apparent political gain. The double-standard at work here is breathtaking.No. 3: The request for assistance was made pursuant to treaty. A 1999 treaty between the United States and Ukraine “On Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters” calls for cooperation from each country in prosecuting crimes. As a matter of fact, the Obama administration made use of that very treaty, and asked Ukraine to investigate then-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort.Far from breaking the law, Trump was actually following the law when he requested support from Ukraine.No. 4: Democrats have no quid pro quo. Quid pro quo, along with “offer and acceptance,” is the foundation of any contract. It’s a Latin phrase literally meaning “this for that” — if you give me this I’ll give you that.Democrats say that the president was holding military funding for Ukraine over Zelensky’s head in exchange for information. This is unsupported by the transcript. In fact: Military funding isn’t mentioned once during the conversation.Indeed, Ukraine military funding was under review long before the phone call. When asked about it afterwards, Zelensky said he was unaware that funding might be curtailed. Afterwards, he saw no connection between Trump’s request and the cut in aid.So according to both parties involved in the conversation, the funding was independent of and unrelated to the issues that were discussed.No. 5: Pelosi rushed to judgment. The California Democrat announced that she was authorizing an impeachment inquiry prior to reviewing any evidence whatsoever, including interviewing witnesses or examining documents in support of an impeachment, including the transcript of the phone conversation.On Tuesday, Sept. 24, Pelosi announced the impeachment inquiry in response to mounting pressure from fellow House Democrats, although she was fully aware that the president was considering the release of the transcript.The following day, Wednesday the 25th, the president declassified the transcript of his phone call and authorized its release. Although not verbatim, it was based on the “records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty Officers and NSC policy staff assigned to listen and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place.”No. 6: The whistle-blower complaint wasn’t one. Former Rep. Bob Barr, R-Ga., observed recently that the document released is not a true whistle-blower complaint. He said that the document delivered to the chairmen of both the House and Senate Intelligence committees was apparently drafted by a member of the CIA, but was clearly a collaborative effort involving several other members of the intelligence community. Despite that, the complaint failed to present evidence of “fraud, waste, or abuse” — the purpose of such complaints.Perhaps most importantly: The whistleblower document provides no evidence that either Trump or Zelensky disclosed information “relating to … intelligence activity involving classified information.”That is, the requisite standard to qualify as an intelligence-community whistleblower complaint was never met.Barr said, in sum, that intelligence-community management was clearly behind the whistleblower complaint, and not a true whistle-blower. Longtime former CIA analyst Fred Fleitz made the same point on Newsmax TV.No. 7: Trump hid nothing. Far from hiding evidence from public view, the president made it available to Congress and the American people. Nevertheless, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., claimed that by transferring the transcript of his phone call to a secure server, he was trying to hide it. Appearing on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Schiff claimed that the “electronic file that is meant for covert action, not meant for this, if there’s an effort to hide those and cover those up, yes we’re determined to find out.”Former administrations routinely kept files on the secure server, including the Obama administration, according to former national security adviser Susan Rice. But to Schiff and fellow Democrats, being fully transparent isn’t being transparent enough — unless it includes a mea culpa.No. 8: Pelosi says she did not want to impeach Trump, but the facts say otherwise. After announcing the formal impeachment probe she appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” and said, “We have to be very prayerful. I pray for the president all the time," adding, "I pray for the safety of his family.”But when Trump was preparing to represent the United States at the 75th anniversary of the Normandy invasion in June, any thoughts of prayers for the Trump family were far from her mind.Pelosi met with senior House Democrats, including House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler. She told the New York Democrat and others who were pressing her for impeachment that “I don’t want to see him impeached, I want to see him in prison.”No. 9: Why not let the people decide? This may be the most compelling reason of all: With just 13 months to go until the next election, why the rush to impeachment? Why not give the American people a chance to make up their own minds on the matter? The presidential campaign is heating up with Trump stepping up his rally appearances and Democratic presidential hopefuls are already preparing for their fourth round of debates. Why not present the evidence to the people as the president has been doing and let them be the judge — in the election booth.Michael Dorstewitz is a retired lawyer and has been a frequent contributor to BizPac Review and Liberty Unyielding. Heis also a former U.S. Merchant Marine officer and an enthusiastic Second Amendment supporter, who can often be found honing his skills at the range.

Slav · Post by **Slav** » Thu Oct 03, 2019 12:14 pm

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=f4O3l1X6K_4Great Post Bruce If this was the 70s Trump would be another JFK, thank God it’s not, what scared me is Polossi saying over and over she fears for there safety, Trump and his Family, the dems have no hope in 2020 they will walk away with an all time Low in votes.

bobspez · Post by **bobspez** » Wed Oct 09, 2019 11:35 pm

I think Trump will be impeached by liberals. The reasons don't have to be logical. What I don't understand is why Clinton was impeached by conservatives. Were they trying to get even for Nixon? Clinton balanced the budget, came down against welfare, didn't mess with big business or the military industrial complex. Many people in power in all walks of life had affairs. Why was he impeached? It made no sense. Maybe this is payback for Clinton?

Slav · Post by **Slav** » Thu Oct 10, 2019 8:50 am

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.washing ... utType=amp

Bruce Patrick Brychek · Thu Oct 10, 2019 5:10 pm

Thursday10.10.201912:10 p.m.,Chicago, Illinois time:Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:Messrs: Slav and Bob Spez I admire, appreciate, enjoy, read, and study all of your contributions withgreat focus. I generally find myself agreeing with you both between 80 - 90% of the time. I often wait to respond to your comments, or the comments of others, to allow them to take root in hopes of encouraging other JFKMS Forum Members Contributions, and more in depth, pro-longed academic discussions which I feel we all benefit from, regardless of Pro vs. Con Points of View.Bob Spez I am going to direct my Analysis and Comments to Your Most Recent Comment in my attempt to state my opinions in an Academic Discussion, connecting and re-raising some of my previous comments and philosophies stated by me here on the JFKMS Forum, applied to today's current U.S. Caldron of Political Stew that may currently be coming to a Boiling Point.Bob your comments are well delineated and well thought out as your comments always are. Thank you.ONE OF MY PRIMARY BELIEFS IS THAT CHARACTER ASSASSINATIONS NOW OFTEN PROCEED ACTUALASSASSINATIONS. I believe that The Deep State, The Secret State, and The High Cabal have learned, to a degree, that Actual Assassinations Create Martyrs, i.e, JFK, MX, MLK, and RFK.Actual Assassinations often keep the door open to "We the People..." Seeking The truth.THIS INTERFERES GREATLY WITH THE DEEP STATE, THE SECRET STATE, AND THE HIGH CABAL TELLING"We the People..." WHAT THE "TRUTH" IS, AND THAT THEY WILL "TEACH US" THE "TRUTH" THROUGH THEVERY CONTROLLED, DIRECTED, REGULATED MAIN STREAM MEDIA.ANOTHER OF MY MAJOR BELIEFS IS THAT WE DON'T HAVE A DEMOCRACY. WE NEVER DID, WE NEVER WILL !THAT IS A JOKE, A PLACEBO, THE OPIATE OF THE AMERICAN "We the People...", as Karl Marx called "Religion the Opiate of the People."The Declaration of Independence, The U.S. Constitution, and The Bill of Rights DO NO HAVE THE WORD"DEMOCRACY" IN ANY OF THESE CONSTANTLY REFERENCED DOCUMENTS.The "One Person One Vote System" is Immediately Neutralized by The Electoral College.That all said, I really believe that "We the People..." have only ONE RULING PARTY. DEMOCRATIC-SOCIALISTS, PROGRESSIVES, REPUBLICANS, etc., again is a Carrot, a Placebo "taught and told" to"We the People..." to Control Revolutions of "We the People..." against Crooked Governments andPoliticians.IN ESSENCE THERE ARE TWO (2) MAJOR GROUPS IN AMERICA.1. The Haves.2. The Have Notes.And there is a Multi-Leveled Control and Power Structure in America that is really "THE INVISIBLEGOVERNMENT."In his Treatise "JEFFERSONIAN DEMOCRACY" Thomas Jefferson, a major contributor to The Declaration ofIndependence, The U.S. Constitution, and The Bill of Rights, stated that a "Democracy" or "Government"needs a Revolution about every 200 years.Remember that The Right To Bear Arms Was Primarily Written To Protect Citizens From Government AndPoliticians, In Addition To Self Defense.Clinton was Impeached by the Conservatives "allegedly" in The House, as part of "...a process."Of course the Process was never completed.Trump may be Impeached by the Liberals "allegedly" in The House, as part of "..a process." I doubtthat The Process will be completed.Trying to tie this together, I believe that Clinton was given A Warning to Toll the Lines, and Stay On Track with the Hidden Agenda of The Deep State, The Secret State, and The High Cabal, OR ELSE !Trump is now being given His Warning.JFK, Clinton, and Trump were/are all GUILTY OF THE SAME "SIN." JFK ACTUALLY THOUGHT THAT HE WAS IN CHARGE. HE WAS REMOVED !Clinton thought that he was In Charge. He was spanked in public, and given his warning.Trump thinks that he is in charge. He is being spanked in public.THIS COUNTRY (AS I OFTEN STATE) IS RUN BY:1. ENDLESS WARS, and2. ENDLESS DRUGS.How's The War(s) Proceeding on the following to name a few:* The War On Crime ?* The War On Drugs, begun under Reagan, but actually formalized in the 1970's with the creation of the DEA ? But in the meantime we now also have The War On Heroin, Opioids, and Fentanyl.* The War(s) On Homelessness ?* The War(s) On Poverty ?* The War(s) On Terrorism ?* The War(s) Against Endless War(s) ?I DO THINK THAT TRUMP's TRAIN LOST ITS WHEELS AND CAME OFF OF THE TRACKS THIS WEEK WHENHE ACTED AND STATED THAT HE WOULD END/STOP ENDLESS WARS !That's a Big No No ! My Opinion.WARS ARE THE BIG BUSINESS OF THE U.S. MILITARY INDUSTRIAL CORPORATIONS. PERIOD !In Oliver Stone's movie "JFK" the most powerful line to me was delivered by Donald Sutherland portraying the Real Life Person, Colonel Leroy Fletcher Prouty, talking to Kevin Costner portrayingNew Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison and Sutherland/Prouty states:"THE GREATEST POWER THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS OVER ITS PEOPLE IS THE ABILITY TO WAGE WAR."The War Powers Act is a NEVER-ENDING, GROWING POWER FOR THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL CORPORATIONS.Please re-watch Retiring President Dwight David Eisenhower's Farwell Speech, and PARTING WARNING.REMEMBER THAT EISENHOWER WAS A FIVE (5) STAR GENERAL IN WORLD WAR II.THE AMERICAN WAR COMPLEX CAN NOT AND WILL NOT ENTERTAIN OR SUSTAIN A LONG, OPEN,"DEMOCRATIC" PUBLIC DEBATE TO THIS. As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers who may not be as well versed as you.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.

Slav · Post by **Slav** » Thu Oct 10, 2019 6:32 pm

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.indiato ... 2019-10-10

JDB4JFK · Post by **JDB4JFK** » Thu Oct 10, 2019 8:40 pm

https://youtu.be/o1ZBhAINr8sGREAT VIDEO!!! Reminds me of the JFK speech to The Press convention. Bobspez Bill Clinton was a horrible president. NAFTA trade deal ruin this country's manufacturing base!

Slav · Post by **Slav** » Thu Oct 10, 2019 8:53 pm

Wow great video JD if we were in the 60’S Trump would be gone after a speech like that https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lc7BI5HbkvY

bobspez · Post by **bobspez** » Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:34 am

It was bad for small business and American workers but great for major corporations who got to take advantage of cheaper labor with overseas manufacturing of goods selling in the US. JDB4JFK wrote:https://youtu.be/o1ZBhAINr8sGREAT VIDEO!!! Reminds me of the JFK speech to The Press convention. Bobspez Bill Clinton was a horrible president. NAFTA trade deal ruin this country's manufacturing base!

bobspez · Post by **bobspez** » Fri Oct 11, 2019 1:20 am

Thanks Bruce. You have hit a number of nails on the head here. Your concept of impeachment as being part of a process, i.e. curbing presidential power and returning control to the ruling class, makes perfect sense. And their actions are motivated by money and power. If there is a benefit for the people, it's OK with them, if not that's OK with them, and if there's great harm to the people, that's OK with them as well.I agree as well that character assassination is a much better tool than creating martyrs. If it doesn't work, then they can always use the actual assassination. The people who rule the world don't really have the morals the average person does. They are above morals and above the law.Agree again that we have one party with two names and philosophies. But The establishment only allows those to run who are considered part of the establishment. Nader had promised to endorse Al Gore if Gore adopted even a single one of Nader's 18 point platform. But Gore declined as he was establishment and Nader was anti-establishment. At that point Nader stated it didn't matter if Gore or Bush won. If Hillary made Bernie her VP candidate she would have won in a landslide. But she was establishment and Bernie is anti-establishment. The truth is the candidates who make it to the election are so much obligated to the power structure that they would rather lose the election than buck the establishment. Trump is an anomaly, much like Jimmy Carter was an anomaly. Like Carter he will be hamstrung by congress and probably be a one term president.Although there are the haves and the have nots, I'm not sure how Important that is. Even the have nots can have a pretty good life without ever being rich or powerful. As long as they serve the haves in some capacity, be it employee, or cop or soldier or politician. You can carve out a decent life if you provide more income for the owners than they have to pay you. That is capitalism, plain and simple. As a young man I worked at an exclusive rich mans dining club. The club manager who had been a German prisoner of war in Russia during WWII told me. "Always remember Bobby, to the members we are just sh*t."Bruce Patrick Brychek wrote:Thursday10.10.201912:10 p.m.,Chicago, Illinois time:Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:Messrs: Slav and Bob Spez I admire, appreciate, enjoy, read, and study all of your contributions withgreat focus. I generally find myself agreeing with you both between 80 - 90% of the time. I often wait to respond to your comments, or the comments of others, to allow them to take root in hopes of encouraging other JFKMS Forum Members Contributions, and more in depth, pro-longed academic discussions which I feel we all benefit from, regardless of Pro vs. Con Points of View.Bob Spez I am going to direct my Analysis and Comments to Your Most Recent Comment in my attempt to state my opinions in an Academic Discussion, connecting and re-raising some of my previous comments and philosophies stated by me here on the JFKMS Forum, applied to today's current U.S. Caldron of Political Stew that may currently be coming to a Boiling Point.Bob your comments are well delineated and well thought out as your comments always are. Thank you.ONE OF MY PRIMARY BELIEFS IS THAT CHARACTER ASSASSINATIONS NOW OFTEN PROCEED ACTUALASSASSINATIONS. I believe that The Deep State, The Secret State, and The High Cabal have learned, to a degree, that Actual Assassinations Create Martyrs, i.e, JFK, MX, MLK, and RFK.Actual Assassinations often keep the door open to "We the People..." Seeking The truth.THIS INTERFERES GREATLY WITH THE DEEP STATE, THE SECRET STATE, AND THE HIGH CABAL TELLING"We the People..." WHAT THE "TRUTH" IS, AND THAT THEY WILL "TEACH US" THE "TRUTH" THROUGH THEVERY CONTROLLED, DIRECTED, REGULATED MAIN STREAM MEDIA.ANOTHER OF MY MAJOR BELIEFS IS THAT WE DON'T HAVE A DEMOCRACY. WE NEVER DID, WE NEVER WILL !THAT IS A JOKE, A PLACEBO, THE OPIATE OF THE AMERICAN "We the People...", as Karl Marx called "Religion the Opiate of the People."The Declaration of Independence, The U.S. Constitution, and The Bill of Rights DO NO HAVE THE WORD"DEMOCRACY" IN ANY OF THESE CONSTANTLY REFERENCED DOCUMENTS.The "One Person One Vote System" is Immediately Neutralized by The Electoral College.That all said, I really believe that "We the People..." have only ONE RULING PARTY. DEMOCRATIC-SOCIALISTS, PROGRESSIVES, REPUBLICANS, etc., again is a Carrot, a Placebo "taught and told" to"We the People..." to Control Revolutions of "We the People..." against Crooked Governments andPoliticians.IN ESSENCE THERE ARE TWO (2) MAJOR GROUPS IN AMERICA.1. The Haves.2. The Have Notes.And there is a Multi-Leveled Control and Power Structure in America that is really "THE INVISIBLEGOVERNMENT."In his Treatise "JEFFERSONIAN DEMOCRACY" Thomas Jefferson, a major contributor to The Declaration ofIndependence, The U.S. Constitution, and The Bill of Rights, stated that a "Democracy" or "Government"needs a Revolution about every 200 years.Remember that The Right To Bear Arms Was Primarily Written To Protect Citizens From Government AndPoliticians, In Addition To Self Defense.Clinton was Impeached by the Conservatives "allegedly" in The House, as part of "...a process."Of course the Process was never completed.Trump may be Impeached by the Liberals "allegedly" in The House, as part of "..a process." I doubtthat The Process will be completed.Trying to tie this together, I believe that Clinton was given A Warning to Toll the Lines, and Stay On Track with the Hidden Agenda of The Deep State, The Secret State, and The High Cabal, OR ELSE !Trump is now being given His Warning.JFK, Clinton, and Trump were/are all GUILTY OF THE SAME "SIN." JFK ACTUALLY THOUGHT THAT HE WAS IN CHARGE. HE WAS REMOVED !Clinton thought that he was In Charge. He was spanked in public, and given his warning.Trump thinks that he is in charge. He is being spanked in public.THIS COUNTRY (AS I OFTEN STATE) IS RUN BY:1. ENDLESS WARS, and2. ENDLESS DRUGS.How's The War(s) Proceeding on the following to name a few:* The War On Crime ?* The War On Drugs, begun under Reagan, but actually formalized in the 1970's with the creation of the DEA ? But in the meantime we now also have The War On Heroin, Opioids, and Fentanyl.* The War(s) On Homelessness ?* The War(s) On Poverty ?* The War(s) On Terrorism ?* The War(s) Against Endless War(s) ?I DO THINK THAT TRUMP's TRAIN LOST ITS WHEELS AND CAME OFF OF THE TRACKS THIS WEEK WHENHE ACTED AND STATED THAT HE WOULD END/STOP ENDLESS WARS !That's a Big No No ! My Opinion.WARS ARE THE BIG BUSINESS OF THE U.S. MILITARY INDUSTRIAL CORPORATIONS. PERIOD !In Oliver Stone's movie "JFK" the most powerful line to me was delivered by Donald Sutherland portraying the Real Life Person, Colonel Leroy Fletcher Prouty, talking to Kevin Costner portrayingNew Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison and Sutherland/Prouty states:"THE GREATEST POWER THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS OVER ITS PEOPLE IS THE ABILITY TO WAGE WAR."The War Powers Act is a NEVER-ENDING, GROWING POWER FOR THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL CORPORATIONS.Please re-watch Retiring President Dwight David Eisenhower's Farwell Speech, and PARTING WARNING.REMEMBER THAT EISENHOWER WAS A FIVE (5) STAR GENERAL IN WORLD WAR II.THE AMERICAN WAR COMPLEX CAN NOT AND WILL NOT ENTERTAIN OR SUSTAIN A LONG, OPEN,"DEMOCRATIC" PUBLIC DEBATE TO THIS. As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers who may not be as well versed as you.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.

JFK RFK MLK Assasination Forum - Archive