Even in a conspiracy, all shots could be from the rear
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:22 am
I have never heard that scenario -- that two or more gunman were shooting from the rear, and no shooter was positioned at the front.
But I think that we must look at that as being a possibility.
I mention this, for most conspiracy buffs seem to demand that the record show that there was a shot from the front, as if they forget that that does not have to be the case for them to advance their point that a conspiracy took place in Dallas in November 1963.
The absence of a shot from the front does not eliminate the possibility of conspiracy.
Don't forget that.
Maybe confederates were found on the knoll area and parking lot -- eg, like the Secret Service imposters -- but evidence seems to show that it wasn't necessary for them to have shot a weapon at all(a shot from the rear found its mark on JFK's head, afterall).
Likewise, pro lone-gunman advocates try to ridicule pro-conspiracy belief by demonstrating only that there was no shooters from the front. I have never heard a Posner ally state that there could not be another shooter at the rear. It is as if the area to the front of the limo is the only area "good" enough to house confederates, and that a lack of a shooter there prohibits one to arrive at the conclusion of conspiracy.
In my beliefs, I don't have to have a shooter at the front. I can even live with one shooter in the 6th floor window. A shooter, that is, with an assistant, on a radio, communicating with confederates on the Plaza, who are backed by those in high positions, situated in different parts of the country, and ready to benefit from the shot of one bullet, that from our one shooter.
One shooter could still be a conspiracy, folks.
Posner could be right. Maybe there was only one shooter.
But we could still be right at the same time, too.
I wonder if Posner ever thought about that.
And have you?
But I think that we must look at that as being a possibility.
I mention this, for most conspiracy buffs seem to demand that the record show that there was a shot from the front, as if they forget that that does not have to be the case for them to advance their point that a conspiracy took place in Dallas in November 1963.
The absence of a shot from the front does not eliminate the possibility of conspiracy.
Don't forget that.
Maybe confederates were found on the knoll area and parking lot -- eg, like the Secret Service imposters -- but evidence seems to show that it wasn't necessary for them to have shot a weapon at all(a shot from the rear found its mark on JFK's head, afterall).
Likewise, pro lone-gunman advocates try to ridicule pro-conspiracy belief by demonstrating only that there was no shooters from the front. I have never heard a Posner ally state that there could not be another shooter at the rear. It is as if the area to the front of the limo is the only area "good" enough to house confederates, and that a lack of a shooter there prohibits one to arrive at the conclusion of conspiracy.
In my beliefs, I don't have to have a shooter at the front. I can even live with one shooter in the 6th floor window. A shooter, that is, with an assistant, on a radio, communicating with confederates on the Plaza, who are backed by those in high positions, situated in different parts of the country, and ready to benefit from the shot of one bullet, that from our one shooter.
One shooter could still be a conspiracy, folks.
Posner could be right. Maybe there was only one shooter.
But we could still be right at the same time, too.
I wonder if Posner ever thought about that.
And have you?