LET'S CHANGE OUR NAME

[Phil Dragoo]

I had occasion to reread John Newman's conclusions of the 1995 Oswald and the CIA in which he says the sensitivity of the Oswald files shows the agency wrapped an operation around Oswald--but he cautions against more efforts to know all the answers, urging a specialization built on firm robust research.John Armstrong has presented an operation from 1951 when Oswald was 12 to create two parallel identities.Jack White is very compelling in his photoanalysis. Recently on DEEP he laid out many Russian Oswalds who differed from the Dallas mugshot Oswald, and of course he debunked the backyard photos. James Douglass recently presented the national security coup as templated on Seven Days In May.I found John Ritchson to be the ballistic last word: http://www.assassinationresearch.com/v3 ... pdfMedical experts include Aguilar, Wecht, Mantik.The Warren Commission propagandists have not proved their premise. What they have clarified is that they present as Eric Hoffer's True Believer, Joseph Stalin's New Soviet Man, Orwell's Inner Party member who are incapable of seeing validity in any criticism of their dogma. Witness Allen Dulles exclaiming at David Lifton, "You have nothing!"Au contraire, Kimosabee, we have the truth.While you persist in peeing on our leg and insisting it's raining.Coup: conspiracy, crossfire, cover-up--not Krazy Kommie Kid with trick-shooting junk gun.JFK''s NSAM 263 reversed by LBJ's NSAM 273 on the first business day after the funeral: shazzaam: Vietnam War, 58,000 on the Wall, big profits for Brown & Root--oh, they're his donors. He's now president and waivers Hoover May 8, 1964, then Hoover announces Oswald in the Billiard Room with the Candlestick May 14, 1964. Quid pro quo; cui bono; QED coup, conspiracy, crossfire, coverup.All neat and tidy--the truth always is.

[kenmurray]

Phil, Newman's "Oswald and the CIA" is another book I want to read. I know Jim D. always talks about it in some of his reviews.

[ChristophMessner]

hard-core-truthers among the broke armchair-jfk-murder-solving-hopers... that should have been provocational ... a bit bitter though ...

[kenmurray]

Hey Chris I see that Chicken Von Pein is selling the SBT over at that other forum among his adoring fans.

[ChristophMessner]

Hi Ken, I would say, that Miles, Tony, Jim, Frankie, me and others are blowing his armchair-buttocks out of the water pretty well over there, don't we? Chris

[jfkanon]

realists.

[Dealey Joe]

I like that one REALISTShas a good ring to it

[kenmurray]

I like it too.

[Dealey Joe]

could we say "Conspiracy Realists"

[ChristophMessner]

That's it, Joe, "Conspiracy Realists" exactly hits the nail concerning the whole discussion about pro and contra "conspiracy theoretics". That terminus intellectus realisticus speaks out of my heart. Is it still a little provocational to the conspiracy-deniers while you throw this terminus as self-description into a discussion? Maybe not if you illuminate some thoughts inhowfar life on earth is based on a conspiracy to let livelyhoods live in complete blindness about the dimensions of this conspiracy by nature haha .... God = Luzifer ... Birth = Death ... Happiness of either = Suffering of other ...