Page 2 of 2

Re: JFK Forum Standard, Major Title, Self Indexing Headlines

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:20 am
by Dealey Joe
We are not yet finished, also we need old files moved to the new and we also have more titles to add.

Re: JFK Forum Standard, Major Title, Self Indexing Headlines

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:11 am
by Dealey Joe
Ladies and Gentlemen, I don't mean to be rude but to make this indexing system work we must use acceptable titles.Do not use long titles. One or two words should work for your information and still be usable for the forum.Thanks for your understanding and cooperation.Dealey Joe

Re: JFK Forum Standard, Major Title, Self Indexing Headlines

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:37 am
by Pasquale DiFabrizio
Dealey Joe wrote:Ladies and Gentlemen, I don't mean to be rude but to make this indexing system work we must use acceptable titles.Do not use long titles. One or two words should work for your information and still be usable for the forum.Thanks for your understanding and cooperation.Dealey JoeJoe,Now I understand why the title of two my recent posts were changed.I only have an issue with one of the changes. It's the topic I started about a bullet that hit a manhole cover that is located directly across the street from the grassy knoll. This is the topic that is now called "James Tague" The whole point of the topic is not about James Tague. It's about a bullet that hit a manhole cover that is NOT the same bullet, or bullet fragment, that hit James Tague. It's about a ".45 slug" that Roger Craig talked about and what two other witnesses talked about as well. Do you think we can change the title of my topic to reflect that? Maybe call it "Missed shots."I'm not used to having the topic titles changed, so forgive my ignorance about this.

Re: JFK Forum Standard, Major Title, Self Indexing Headlines

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:41 pm
by Dealey Joe
Thanks Pasquale, missed shots work very well I think.