THE GREATEST STORY EVER SOLD:

JFK Assassination
Locked
Bruce Patrick Brychek
Posts: 1306
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

THE GREATEST STORY EVER SOLD:

Post by Bruce Patrick Brychek »

12.09.2018SUNDAY4:32 p.m.Chicago, Illinois time.Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:People, to what extent is the "New President" anointed, chosen, "elected," empowered,and selected to:COVER-UP FOR THE HIGH CABAL, AND THEIR PREVIOUS ACTIONS "UNDER PREVIOUS PRESIDENTS ?"* LBJ was "elected" for one term of his own, after the removal of JFK, planned since 1961.* I believe that was the deal all along "too move beyond JFK," and set-up the election of Nixon, who was supposed to choose GHWB as his Vice President.* Gerald Ford, who on his death bed admitted that he altered JFK Autopsy photos, to help theNation heal and move beyond the JFK Removal, ALSO,FORD PARDONED RICHARD MILHOUS NIXON AFTER WATERGATE SO "THE NATION COULD HEAL."* WHO BETTER TO HELP COVER-UP FOR THE HIGH CABAL AND FURTHER BURY THE SINS OF EISENHOWER AND HIS VP, NIXON AND OPERATION 40, THEN LBJ AND VIETNAM, THEN NIXON,AND LATER GHWB AND CHENEY ?* Think about how much 09.11.2001 helped cover-u and "bury."* What if anything did Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, or barack Obama do to challenge anything ?Bruce Patrick Brychek, 2018,THE GREATEST STORY EVER SOLD: THE DECLINE AND FALL OF TRUTH FROM 9/11 TOKATRINA, copyright 2006 by Frank Rich.“When America was attacked on 9/11, its citizens almost unanimously rallied behind its new, untested president as he went to war. What they didn’t know at the time was that Bush administrations’ highest priority would be not to vanquish Al Qaeda but to consolidate its ownpower at any cost. It was a mission that could be accomplished only by a propagandapresidency in which reality was steadily replaced by a scenario of the White houses’ owninvention — and such was that scenario’s devious brilliance that it fashioned a second war against an enemy who did not attack America 0n 9/11, intimidated the Democrats into coherence and impotence, and turned a presidential election into an irrelevant referendumon macho imagery, Vietnam, and “moral values.”As only he can, acclaimed New York Times columnist Frank Rich delivers a step-by-stepchronicle of how skillfully the White House built its own house of cards, and how theinstitutions that should have exposed these fictions, the mainstream news media, were toooften left powerless by the administration’s relentless attack machine, their own post 9/11timidity, and an unending parade of self-inflicted scandals (typified by those at The New York Times). Demonstrating the candor and conviction that have made him one of our most trusted and incisive public voices, he brilliantly and meticulously illuminates the White House’s disturbing affair with “truthiness” and the ways in which a bungled was, a seeminglyobscure Washington leak, and a devastating hurricane at long last revealed the man behindthe curtain, as well as the story had been so effectively sold to the nation as God-givenPatriotic act.”“The attacks of 9/11 marked a new morning in America — a wake-up call, you’d think, for acountry that had become habituated to peace and prosperity and had had the luxury of devoting several years t obsessing about a president’s seamy sex life. But whatever else9/11 was, we can see now that it was the beginning of a new national narrative — a compelling and often persuasive story that was told by the president of the United Statesand his administration to mobilize a shell-shocked country desperate to be led. The storywas often at variance with the facts that have come to light since. But it did have a slickpatina of plausibility. The Story was effective enough to take America into a war against anation that did not attack it on 9/11. When future Americans look back on this period andask, ‘how did this happen ?’ the cultural context of the early twenty-first century may explainat least as much as the characters and official actions that played out against the backdrop.”History appears poised to confirm what most Americans today have decided — that the decisions invade Iraq was a serious strategic blunder. No one, including me, can know withabsolute certainty how the war will be viewed decades from now when we can more fullyunderstand its impact. What I do know is that war should only be waged when necessary, and the Iraq War was not. Aging an unnecessary war is a grave mistake. But in reflecting on all that happened during the Bush administration, I’ve come to believe that an even more fundamentalmistake was made — a decision to turn away from candor and honesty when those qualities were most needed.?As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers who may not be as well versed as you.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.
Locked