Jimmy Files Shot To JFK'S Head Killed JFK Instantly:

[Dealey Joe]

andries wrote:Does it really matter that mutch to justify irritation, if James Files is telling a 10-50 or 100 % thruth ?Even in case if he is only telling a 10% thruth it will make this forum probably still less filled with with lies, than the dark side.Andries i don't think it is so much the degree of belief but the thing that bothers me is the disinformation coming from the CT camp.I am afraid that some of these folks want to be considered experts so much that they are becoming our own enemies.I have great respect for the members of this forum and try to respect their beliefs and findings.But it is evident that we can't even come to the conclusions that we really know anything.We overlook the obviouse and try to disprove everything.We have never took the trouble to try to understand LHO, James Files, Jack Ruby and the other key players.To me if we fail to understand these basic entities in the conspiracyt is useless to go further.we have allowed the conspirators to confuse us about this basic knowledge.Judyth Baker told me that Lee used O. H. Lee but that A.J Hidell was used by others too.We are on the trail of LHO in Oak Cliff and I hope we can put a few things together toshow what most likely happened there in 1963. It takes many hours to find some of this stuff.John Armstrong has put together a B.S. scenereo of all the so called witnesses who saw Oswald after the shooting.90 percent of these people didn't see shit.Mary Bledsoe lied about the bus ride.and the bus transfer ticket was not found on LHO if found at all was in a shirt pocket in his room.on and on.

[Dealey Joe]

Kirk wrote:Hard Feelings and What little I knowI am still a new guy on this forum, and just like life being a New Guy means you don't quite get the inside jokes, and tend to ask questions that only a new person would ask. It is a fear of mine that I am being redundant, but I also know that in some cases asking the question again can lead towards a greater understanding for all. I have noticed since reading the forum that there is from time to time some frayed nerves, frustrations, and a general moodiness on certain subjects or questions. Sounds like my former marriage to be honest.In truth all of this is to be expected really considering the subject matter, and the agony and loss of that, which has in a strange way brought most all of you together from different backgrounds, experiences and beliefs. Those backgrounds, experiences and beliefs do not change so much, as being added to with knowledged shared between each other. I think that is way this forum really is something to be proud of. And even the same old question that comes from new blood is answered with dignity and integrity. I am very grateful for this. I have been enlightened in many ways by you all. Yes, I have pondered the throat shot from the front. Mainly because I have come across this information from other souces outside of this forum. I tend to try and use the collective consensus of you all as a guide to all the other sources and "evidence".A sense of humor is a big help in keeping one's humanity. A verse of a song says: Would you like a little coffee? I ain't no one's cup teaKirk i think your analogy of like a marriage is a good one.A good marriage requires agreement, coming to an agreement is nessecary to survivle.anything with 2 heads is a freek and will not long survive.To me this forum is based on this web site and its findings.There is a wealth of information on the front page.anyone who gets on the forum should educate themselves to the findings of what the site is al about.I think if we watch the James Files, Judyth Baker, Ed Haslem, Chaubcy Holt DVDsRead the Files on JFK and Dr. Mary's Monkey Books, will set the pace for forum membersAs for me I studied this material before deciding I wanted to become a forum member.I already esyablished a strong belief of James Files, Judyth Baker, Chauncy Holt, and the premiss of the web site.It is all well put together and not based upon conjector and a tremendous amount of solid informationi developed a respect for Wim and all those who have stepped forward with their stories and have nointerest in proving them wrong.I see this forum as a disfunctional family that needs to come to some agreement about certain things and work on them in a positive way.All said I want to tell you that I grreatly appreciate your attitude, your approach and commemts on the forum.

[Kirk]

Thanks Joe,And likewise of course. I enjoy the give and take between people and sides. I am still not up or informed enough on the sides part. I agree of course about Oswald, whether "Lee" or "Harvey" etc. I am really impressed by the work done by Jack White, but in truth it is a little hard for me to get my mind around it.

[ThomZajac]

Wim wrote-"The so called JFK research community is its own worst enemy, in the sense that some researchers who sincerely believe that JFK was killed through a conspircay, have fallen blindly in love with their own theories. Some of these are truly whacko, like the limousine hace to a full halt and the Zapruder film was altered and tamperd to conceal that "fact". Wim, do you not see the irony in the above?Thom

[bob franklin]

Here's what I strongly believe happened: Nicoletti's back - shot, or bone/metal shrapnel from it tore the arch of jfk's aorta wide open. He was bleeding out between the first and head shots. Had both head shots missed, the man would've been dead before the front bumper of the limo had passed under the the beginning of the first overpass. As to jfk saying anything after that first shot, allow me to relate the following anecdote: during my first year of jr high school, during lunch period one day a couple of my crazier friends decided to play a little joke on me. they took a sheet of tinfoil from their hot - tray & wrapped it tightly around a baseball sized wad of pea gravel from the school parking lot. the bigger of the two guys then hurled it with considerable force at my back, catching me almost exactly the same spot. I never saw it coming. I saw only stars, for a fraction of an instant. Lights out, no time or ability to say anything. that was only reynolds wrap & gravel, imagine the impact of a bullet. I doubt jfk was even conscious, let alone able to utter anything. Just my .02[img]anatomy.jpg

[dankbaar]

Thom Zajac,In response to your private message: I did not mean disrespect for your opinion. I had the same opinion myself for a long time, untill 1) I got the information from Bruce and Jimmy on what they think must have caused the throat wound.2) I re-evaluated the known facts, rathers than following the common belief of a frontal entry from a bullet. I merely vented support for Bruce's frustration with people refusing to acknowledge these facts or ignoring them. If you want to maintain your opinion and discuss it, then I think it's fair from Bruce tos ask you to address the following questions:1) At which point in time on the Zapruder film was JFK in the throat by your frontal shooter. 2) Where was this shooter located, and what is the evidence to support the presence of that shooter on that location? 3) What happened to the bullet? 4) What is the reason for the absence of an exit wound? 5) How do you value the testimony of Kellerman that Kennedy said I am hit, take me to a hospital? 6 ) How do you value the testimony of autopsy witness Thom Robinson, who said that the gaping skull wound was probed and that one of the trajectories from the skullwound came out in the throat wound? 7) What caused the tiny perforations in Kennedy's face that Robinson filled with wax? Wim

[Bruce Patrick Brychek]

Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members:09.22.2006 - I Posted this powerful Headline. I still maintain this position.Lengthy discussions followed, some still worthwhile.11.22.2012 - Today seems like an appropriate date to re-instigate discussion on this subject matter for those who are interested.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.

[Dealey Joe]

The cover-up started when they was telling us the a man with no brain was still alive?

[Bruce Patrick Brychek]

Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:09.22.2006 - I Posted this Headline and a lengthy, powerful discussion followed.Many points of information and analysis were offered by many great Members Here.Review this and consider everything here in conjunction with the other Headlinesand Posts about JFK's Head Wounds.Combined, there is a Treasure Trove of evidence and research here to considerand evaluate both Pro and Con.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.

[Bruce Patrick Brychek]

05.16.2013Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:09.22.2006 - I originally Posted this Headline.Suggestions ?Thoughts ?Comments ?Respectfully,BB.